User Reviews
View reviews where users commented on categories.
Clear selectionsDisplaying 31 - 40 of 55 1992 Chevrolet Camaro reviews.
|
1992 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 Convertible RWDReview
Crystal writes:
Every Car Is Different — The Camaro is very well at handling. It doesn't take much to make this car fast. These cars aren't that expensive and are pretty realible. I love driving my Camaro. Being a convertible it has its down falls, like rattling a little when you hit bumps and stuff but thats all older convertibles no matter what make. Camaros are also a rough ride. My camaro doesn't get very good gas mileage its aprox. 13 miles to the gallon. But than again Im not afraid to put my foot in it. This car sure wasn't designed for anyone besides two people. The back seat space is extremely small. What else can I say besides I love my Camaro z28. Pros: Handles well, looks good, and is cheap to get performance. Cons: Not very much room in the back, gas mileage is bad, and being a converitble its high maintenance. |
|
1992 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 Coupe RWDReview
William writes:
One Of The Five Camaro's I Have Owned (by No Means The Fastest Tho) — I loved my car it was the 25th anniversary limited edition with the red racing stripes and the rally wheels came with a stock 350 but I went in and ported polished and tuned it till it was putting out 450 horses. Pros: fast, loud, fun, and a chick magnet Cons: cost of gas, fuel economy sucks, tickets galore for speeding and street racing |
|
1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS Coupe RWDReview
Cody writes:
I Love This Car! — I love my baby! Its has perfect balance performance wise although she needs a less restrictive exhaust,headers, and intake. Body wise its near perfect just needs a fresh coat of paint. Gets great gas mileage for a V8 and the interior is in excellent condition! I love to drive this car it is the most fun Ive had in a long time! Pros: Tons of fun to drive! Cons: Its a lil squirrely in the rain. |
|
1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS Coupe RWDReview
William writes:
'92 Camaro - Good Till The Last Drop — The '92 was the last year the Camaro had a solid body before it fell to utterly "ugly" in the Appearance department. The V8 short shift gets you off first and has amazing get up and go at any speed. 2nd and 3rd would throw you back in your seat. Unfortunately being a 16-17 year old car, it requires significant aftermarket care to keep it running. not as solid as some of the other early 90's sports cars (Supra, 300zx, RX7, etc) Pros: Power, Speed, Handling, Sexy Value Cons: Age, V8 isn't as reliable as You'd Hope, RS isn't as sexy as the Z or Iroc |
|
1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS Coupe RWDReview
Marc writes:
Sweetness — i have the RS edition, even tho it is not the TPI 350, i think the 305 TBI has decent power for just tooling around the roads. your not gonna win many races with it lol. it does, atleast mine does, have good throttle response. the only thing that i have ever had a problem with is the pillar plastic on the inside passenger, the clips broke. no biggie. not bad on gas for a 8. and yes its very fun to drive, id get more if i could Pros: everything Cons: nothing |
|
1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS Coupe RWDReview
Casey writes:
1992 Camaro Rs 25th Anniversary — This car is my baby. I absolutely LOVE it! Great overall performance: great acceleration (duh! ;-), very responsive handling and very stable and controllable and high speed, good responsive fade-resistent brakes. The build quality is very acceptable for a 17year old car with over 240K on the odometer, i mean its definitly no bimmer, but it is still very solid and i feel confident driving it pretty much anywhere. The only real problem i have right now is that the t-tops leak and that is simply because i havent taken the time to replace the 16-year-old rubber seals yet. Appearance is obvious, this car looks amazing! As far as cost of ownership goes, its not that great, primarilly because of the inflated insurance premium because of the fact that i am a 17-year-old caucasian male. Because of the modifications to the engine as well as my "spirited" driving style, i only get about 18-19mpg on average. But, it is SO WORTH IT!! This is an amazingly fun car to drive and it gets a lot of looks in town. Pros: Everything Cons: $4.00 a gallon gas |
|
1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS Coupe RWDReview
Jordan writes:
305, Green, T-tops, Stock — i love it. i want to put a new exhaust system and power adders, also a cowl hood and get repainted to the same green it is now. maybe change the rims and take it down the strip at least once or twice. and im not gonna keep it stock Pros: 305 Cons: t-tops |
|
1992 Chevrolet CamaroReview
Crystal writes:
Every Car Has Its Bad As Well As Its Good Points — There is hardly any room for passengers in the back seat. Gas mileage is horrible. Its pretty heavy. But I like the color combinations. I like how the fact that there is so much you can do to increase the performance. It handles great!! Not very good in the snow!! Pros: handling, easy to work on, cheap to build performance, and gets some looks!!! Cons: Horrible gas mileage, no room for more than two people, and its pretty heavy being a converitible. |
|
1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS Coupe RWDReview
Gary writes:
Just Right — I bought this car for $1650. I drove it for about 5,000 miles and then the engine started knocking. I put it in the garage in hopes to get back to in one day. And then in March 2008 I decided to put a Remanufactured 305 in it. So, I did. It ran decent but was choking up. So, I rebuilt the Throttle Body Injection (TBI). And now it runs like a champ. Its not the most powerful car. But it works for me now. I am in the process of paying for American Racing Torq Thrust II. I plan on installing a flowmaster exhast soon. And then get a nice paint job. Pros: Powerful but not to powerful. Run smooth. Cons: Needs paint and has no A/C |
|
1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS Coupe RWDReview
Carlos writes:
Nice Look And Built But Too Strong Engine For The Car's Weight — Great speed and acceleration but dangerous in wet weather.. difficult to control when braking and turning. Very comfortable and spacious in front seats Pros: fast acceleration and handling whe passing Cons: easy to lose control at speed beyond 70 mph |
Displaying 31 - 40 of 55 1992 Chevrolet Camaro reviews.
Reviews From Other Years
2020 Chevrolet Camaro Reviews
Review By Guru17YKS
Rather have black rims an cloth seats not leather Read More
Review By GuruF8RL7
This car is absolutely amazing inside and out! Read More
2019 Chevrolet Camaro Reviews
Review By Trent
This is a bada$$ car. worth the $$$. lots of features. the only issue is lack of storage area Read More
Review By Robin
I would give anything to have a convertabke one an I wld be great advertisement for them if I had ine Read More
2017 Chevrolet Camaro Reviews
Review By Richard
The beautiful looks , wonderful feel of the road, not to mention the immediate power of ZL1 is second to none, however the fact you can¨t get upgrade interior & visibility is lacking, While the ford ... Read More
Review By Guru16MXS
Love it test drove it and end up buying it Read More
2016 Chevrolet Camaro Reviews
Review By Alpo
Car was what I expected. I ended up buying it but could not get any negotiations going. I ended up paying a little too much. Read More
Review By Ojas
the material quality wasnt all that impressive and the view out the car was horrible. The 2016 Camaros had a design change from the previous generation which makes it look stunning both on the outside... Read More
2015 Chevrolet Camaro Reviews
Review By Warren
This car has all the features I wanted great deal thanks for your time and a great car Read More
Review By GuruX2XRT
Iam looking for a folding hardtop conveertibe, your menu does address this Read More
Cars compared to 1992 Chevrolet Camaro
Looking for a Used Camaro in your area?
CarGurus has 10,868 nationwide Camaro listings starting at $2,500.