User Reviews
View reviews where users commented on categories.
Clear selectionsDisplaying 11 - 20 of 1983 Ford Mustang 20 reviews.
1983 Ford Mustang LX Convertible RWDReview
James writes:
My Little Pony (lol) — i love my mustang it is my toy. it needs new paint and a new top. its to loud shreds tires and is all but impossible to drive in the rain. it only gets about 10 mpg. it is the first foxbody with a 4 barrel carb. factory conv, they used a marine block and crank. and i love it... Pros: its mine and i can stomp on the gas and go sideways at almost any speed Cons: it needs new paint and top but hey its 26 years old. |
1983 Ford Mustang GT Coupe RWDReview
Ethan writes:
It Was A Sick Car — it was a straight out muscle car i just wish mine had the 5 spd rather then the 4spd was my first car i bought when i was 14 and did a motor swap for a 87 mustang gt motor so it had the rollar cams in it how everit was really pratical to drive ever day so i moved to fuel injection Pros: lould mean fast old school Cons: drank gas scared your gf and wasnt pratical fro ever day use |
1983 Ford Mustang GT Coupe RWDReview
Dallas writes:
So Far It's A Piece, I Got It Cheap And It Needs Work — So far it's a piece...I bought cheap so it's a fixer upper...one of the lifters isn't working properly so I need to change that-and I will start on the 1st (when I get paid next). It has a 302, so I'm happy, it does run, but with the lifter messing up it's knocking, but nothing terrible...other than the that the body is rusting-so I'm gonna get to replace that too, and yeah the interior needs work too, so I'll find out how to do that as well :) Pros: 302, Fox body Cons: Runs like a piece |
1983 Ford Mustang GT Coupe RWDReview
David writes:
$600 Clist Special Turned-good — So, it's a fox body stang, with the 302, (non roller, two piece rear main, missed it by a month {11/82 build date}) and the hilariously small SROD 4-speed. It runs, it drives (barely) and it's rollin' on stock 14s. :: sigh :: She's got a ways to go still :) Pros: No Car Payments, and only about $600 in parts to get her daily drivable Cons: Looks like the beater she is, lacks useful improvements that'd allow more power to get pulled from her... still has the smog pump hanging on the pulley, even with things disconnected. |
1983 Ford Mustang GT Coupe RWDReview
bruce writes:
I Got This Convertible Instead Of A Motor Bike — I bought this car as a fix up project for my son and I to work on. Neither of us know much about cars so we thought we would learn together. It needs the front and rear bumper replaced,a new soft top and paint job. It runs well and is fun to drive. Any tips on how to improve performance would be welcome. |
1983 Ford Mustang GT Coupe RWDReview
monch writes:
|
1983 Ford Mustang LX Coupe RWDReview
scareme2 writes:
"not A Bad Little Car" — I have a 1983 forrd mustang which has a v-6 engine and automatic transmission.. It is a rear wheel drive with 14 inch tires. The carberation and exhaust is all origional, It has relativley low miles as some one who owned it befor me did not drive it much. It has good power and consistent response with no hesitation durring exceleration. Down side, its rear wheel drive and it does not have the shure footednes of the front wheel drive mustang, I owned a 84 GT Mustang befor this one and it handled better in that department. Owner for 6 years, 0 months Miles Driven per Year:200 |
1983 Ford MustangReview
meanoldmoe writes:
|
1983 Ford Mustang LX Convertible RWDReview
Benjamin writes:
My Red Flash — I always admired the Mustang LX as it is quicker, leaner and more agile over the Mustang GT model which has some extra weight and has a heavier look to it. The 5 speed manual mated with the 5.0 High Output V8 engine makes for an exciting driving experience. Pros: This is a one year edition GLX Mustang, Very Powerful car, fun to drive, handles like a sports car, gets a lot of looks, comfortable on trips, trophy winner Cons: Uses premium gas, only downside, gets about 17-19mpg which isn't too bad |
1983 Ford Mustang GT Coupe RWD Review
SpeedRacerPro says:
Powerful & fast. Lacks handling & seat comfort. vs1983 Toyota Supra 2 dr Hatchback L-Type
1983 Ford Mustang GT Coupe RWD winning categories:
Looks/Style
Ranked 1983 Toyota Supra 2 dr Hatchback L-Type better.
"83 mustang looks dorky"
Value
Ranked 1983 Toyota Supra 2 dr Hatchback L-Type better.
"Aesthetics and styling and racing comfort and handling is way better vs mustang gt coupe." |
Displaying 11 - 20 of 1983 Ford Mustang 20 reviews.
Reviews From Other Years
2020 Ford Mustang Reviews
Review By 2020MustangGT
I love the car features it has everything. The value of the car was great I looked around for a while till I found this one. Read More
Review By GuruGW6YF
The car is a great value .Lot of muscle power with the turbo engine. Read More
2019 Ford Mustang Reviews
Review By Simonfinds1
I bought the mustang due to the sound and technology it is fast affordable and a great value Read More
Review By Abhinav
No, has a massive$15k insurance claim on it. I would say, stay away Read More
2018 Ford Mustang Reviews
Review By Guru99S8RG
Todays best value for performance and great performance at under 35,000 Read More
Review By Guru9DSV9C
Great driving experience, great features with the premium package trims. Read More
2017 Ford Mustang Reviews
Review By trevorM0904
its a great car super nice and stupid fast loved it ! Read More
Review By Guru99RQFG
Great car, just don’t include the interior lights or the mycolor feature unless it’s a premium model. Read More
2016 Ford Mustang Reviews
Review By 9likemyjeans
If you’re look to buy a convertible used yes it’s a great but if your buying it brand new it doesn’t matter if it a gt or they don’t share the same resell value and also if you sell convertible during... Read More
Review By Kenneth
best bang for the buck on the road today. All the looks and style of his big brother the GT, none of the fuel bill or price tag. Read More
Cars compared to 1983 Ford Mustang

Looking for a Used Mustang in your area?
CarGurus has 25,848 nationwide Mustang listings starting at $1,600.