Have you driven a 1970 Volvo 142?  

User Reviews

1970 Volvo 142Review
Stefan writes:

Temporary Crap. — It was quite a beat up old wreck I bought as a temporary replacement for my BMW 2002 when I rebuilt its engine. The Volvos engine expired in a huge bang while driving into Stockholm to finalize the BMW rebuild.

Pros: Dirt cheap

Cons: 80 bhp and an automatic transmission can never be considered High Performance

Is this review helpful? Yes | No

Looking for a Used 142 in your area?

CarGurus has thousands of nationwide listings and the tools to find you a great deal.


Reviews From Other Years

1973 Volvo 142 Reviews

My First Car By Marc

My brother gave me this car with 160K miles. I spent the summer fixing all the rust holes but everything else was fine. For its day it was a very nice car. 4 wheel disk breaks, fuel injection and e... Read More

1971 Volvo 142 Reviews

The Volvos In Our Lives By Dave

volvos are like a fine cheese the older they get the more they smell, the volvo or "volvenator as we call it is a car with a difference it does 10 km to the litre and 0- 100 in 10 to 15 min but some h... Read More

1968 Volvo 142 Reviews

Today The Us Nta Would Have Recalled This Car By OldTechie

1. The B142B engines in this year's model blew up with regularity with 30-60K miles (pistons were too tight for cylinders - Volvo never acknowledged problem); 2. The vent and rear window hinges woul... Read More

Classic By Johan

Old and reliable, does not make this quality anymore. Not a dream to drive, but it turns some heads when it is in good original condition. Easy to repair, parts still available and it has a... persona... Read More

Have you driven a 1970 Volvo 142?