Have you driven a 1967 Saab 95?  

User Reviews

1967 Saab 95Review
Stefan writes:

Old, Old, Old — 65 bhp is not much, even in a small car as the SAAB 95. It was reasonably well put together, not like a modern crap SAAB, but it was rusty, hade so so brakes, a gearbox that would'nt stay in top gear. BUT, it had a lot of room for cargo when you folded the rear seat. And with a free wheeling gearbox (a left over from the early two cycle engines SAAB used up to 1966) it was not too bad on fuel. But it was a dog, uncomfrotable, heavy steering, sideways driving position, etc.

Pros: Nothing really.

Cons: Very old fashoined

Is this review helpful? Yes | No

Looking for a Used 95 in your area?

CarGurus has thousands of nationwide listings and the tools to find you a great deal.


Reviews From Other Years

1974 Saab 95 Reviews

Good Old Car, Good For Laughs. By Cyrus

Slow, but what are you expecting from a 1500 cc engine from the early 70's? it squeaks a bit but again... It really is a beautiful car and the build quality is quite surprisingly good I can only r... Read More

1970 Saab 95 Reviews

A Great Car To Have. It Led Me To Buying Only A Saab Product For The Next 25 Years. By Michael

With the V-4 engine and a 4 speed on the column tranny. this car was unique. That it also had a transmission freewheel made it a great car to drive on ice. Each time I thought I had broken something ... Read More

Have you driven a 1967 Saab 95?