1966 Triumph 2000 User Reviews

Have you driven a 1966 Triumph 2000?  
Rank This Car

User Reviews

1966 Triumph 2000Review
mikejapp writes:
Cargo Capacity:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Maintenance Cost:

Family Triumph — No air conditioning. This is a 1966 car with the styling and technology available at the time. But now the car is 47 years old, so in order to run good it need to be cared for a lot, which I don't have a lot of time to do.

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

Pros: Rare car, 4-door family Triumph, one that very few people know about.

Cons: Stromberg carbs are difficult to sync and tune.

Is this review helpful? Yes | No

Looking for a Used 2000 in your area?

CarGurus has thousands of nationwide listings and the tools to find you a great deal.


Reviews From Other Years

1969 Triumph 2000 Reviews

Love It...even With The Occasional Flaws By Richie

0 - 60 less than 16 secs. brilliant engine noise. handles well with qutie stiff but not too stiff suspension. not much body roll round corners. paint starting to chip though. always a ticking noise... Read More

1963 Triumph 2000 Reviews

Good Looks And Loads Of Fun By Chris

This car has been upgraded and renewed throughout, the engine is a 2.5 litre six cylinder it has overdrive, modified wheels and tyres. It has modern seats from a Rover 600 and is maintained regardl... Read More

Have you driven a 1966 Triumph 2000?  
Rank Your Car →