<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: M Sport Trim Does Not Equal M1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cargurus.com/blog/2009/01/05/m-sport-trim-does-not-equal-m1/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cargurus.com/blog/2009/01/05/m-sport-trim-does-not-equal-m1</link>
	<description>Daily coverage of the world of cars, including upcoming cars, industry news, car politics, fun lists, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:26:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.cargurus.com/blog/2009/01/05/m-sport-trim-does-not-equal-m1/comment-page-1#comment-13622</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cargurus.com/blog/?p=1761#comment-13622</guid>
		<description>No excuse for aggravating M-owners you say? If anything BMW is slapping M-owners in the face by cancelling the M3 CSL in favor of the X6M and X5M, BMW should have started a land-rover esque company for SUVs rather than diluting their sense of handling and performance by building 2 tonne + boats.

 In regards to the 1 series it is a spiritual successor to the 2002 so naming the high end version the tii would fit nicely. Anyways BMW makes M packages for their other vehicles in standard trim so why can&#039;t the 1 series get the same treatment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No excuse for aggravating M-owners you say? If anything BMW is slapping M-owners in the face by cancelling the M3 CSL in favor of the X6M and X5M, BMW should have started a land-rover esque company for SUVs rather than diluting their sense of handling and performance by building 2 tonne + boats.</p>
<p> In regards to the 1 series it is a spiritual successor to the 2002 so naming the high end version the tii would fit nicely. Anyways BMW makes M packages for their other vehicles in standard trim so why can&#8217;t the 1 series get the same treatment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgoods</title>
		<link>http://www.cargurus.com/blog/2009/01/05/m-sport-trim-does-not-equal-m1/comment-page-1#comment-13525</link>
		<dc:creator>jgoods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cargurus.com/blog/?p=1761#comment-13525</guid>
		<description>Colin is right. There&#039;s no excuse for aggravating the M-owners, the company&#039;s most fervid fans. There are rumors of an M-car to come for the 1 series, but the company claims it won&#039;t be labeled M1; that handle is already taken. BUT, now the company is talking about a new M1 concept car: see http://www.coolhunting.com/archives/2008/04/bmw_m1.php. Do you think these guys have a problem with nomenclature?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colin is right. There&#8217;s no excuse for aggravating the M-owners, the company&#8217;s most fervid fans. There are rumors of an M-car to come for the 1 series, but the company claims it won&#8217;t be labeled M1; that handle is already taken. BUT, now the company is talking about a new M1 concept car: see <a href="http://www.coolhunting.com/archives/2008/04/bmw_m1.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolhunting.com/archives/2008/04/bmw_m1.php</a>. Do you think these guys have a problem with nomenclature?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://www.cargurus.com/blog/2009/01/05/m-sport-trim-does-not-equal-m1/comment-page-1#comment-13520</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cargurus.com/blog/?p=1761#comment-13520</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t like it. Give it the extra look without putting the M badge on it. Customers pay a premium for that M badge on the back and will most likely not like that a regular version can now sport the M logo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t like it. Give it the extra look without putting the M badge on it. Customers pay a premium for that M badge on the back and will most likely not like that a regular version can now sport the M logo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
