Compare Cars

1966 Pontiac GTO

Base

1966 Ford Mustang

GT Fastback

Select a car to compare

Change car

Select a car to compare

Change car

Select a car to compare

Change car
Pricing
  ---
  ---
Overall Rating by CarGurus users Show all ratings
4.7 ⁄ 5
Based on 3 reviews
5 ⁄ 5
Based on 2 reviews
---
Price Rating
4.3 out of 5 stars4.3 out of 5 stars4.3 out of 5 stars4.3 out of 5 stars4.3 out of 5 stars 4.3 ⁄ 5
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars 5 ⁄ 5
---
Reliability Rating
4.7 out of 5 stars4.7 out of 5 stars4.7 out of 5 stars4.7 out of 5 stars4.7 out of 5 stars 4.7 ⁄ 5
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars 5 ⁄ 5
---
Maintenance Cost Rating
3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars 3 ⁄ 5
2 out of 5 stars2 out of 5 stars2 out of 5 stars2 out of 5 stars2 out of 5 stars 2 ⁄ 5
---
Performance Rating
---
3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars 3 ⁄ 5
---
Quality Rating
---
3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars 3 ⁄ 5
---
Appearance Rating
---
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars 5 ⁄ 5
---
Looks/Style Rating
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars 5 ⁄ 5
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars 5 ⁄ 5
---
Family Car Rating
2.3 out of 5 stars2.3 out of 5 stars2.3 out of 5 stars2.3 out of 5 stars2.3 out of 5 stars 2.3 ⁄ 5
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars 5 ⁄ 5
---
Cargo Capacity Rating
3.3 out of 5 stars3.3 out of 5 stars3.3 out of 5 stars3.3 out of 5 stars3.3 out of 5 stars 3.3 ⁄ 5
3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars 3 ⁄ 5
---
Power Rating
4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars 4 ⁄ 5
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars 5 ⁄ 5
---
Handling Rating
4.7 out of 5 stars4.7 out of 5 stars4.7 out of 5 stars4.7 out of 5 stars4.7 out of 5 stars 4.7 ⁄ 5
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars 5 ⁄ 5
---
Fuel Economy Rating
2 out of 5 stars2 out of 5 stars2 out of 5 stars2 out of 5 stars2 out of 5 stars 2 ⁄ 5
3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars 3 ⁄ 5
---
Front Seats Rating
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars 5 ⁄ 5
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars 5 ⁄ 5
---
Back Seats Rating
4.5 out of 5 stars4.5 out of 5 stars4.5 out of 5 stars4.5 out of 5 stars4.5 out of 5 stars 4.5 ⁄ 5
---
---
Pros based on CarGurus user reviews Show more
Cons based on CarGurus user reviews
Powertrain
Drivetrain --- --- ---
Fuel Economy, City --- --- ---
Fuel Economy, Highway --- --- ---
Fuel Tank Volume --- --- ---
Engine
Fuel Type --- --- ---