Follow us on:

2008 Volvo S40 2.4i Reviews

S40
Looking for a Used S40 in your area?
CarGurus has 1,150 Nationwide S40 Listings starting at $3,995.
ZIP:

A Very Good Car...only Slightly Ruined By Its Price

front
By: Jonathan3880...
Overall:
4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars

Performance:
4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars

Build Quality:
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars

Appearance:
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars
06/18/2009

The Volvo S40 does not seem to be a significant car when you take into account that its based on a European Ford Focus but is quite a lot more expensive. Yet after driving one, its really the feature it includes which might explain why its rather expensive.

I like the way new Volvos have looked, they're no longer the square bricks I remember from the 80s where some looked ghastly. The interior is actually quite nice in an S40, there's quite a few buttons but not enough to overwhelm you. The most notable feature is BLIT which is basically a blind spot detector, nifty...but hopefully you don't fully rely on it. Still the nice touches are why some might buy one.

To drive its pretty similar to driving a heavy Mazda3 since both are based off the same European Ford Focus platform(the American one is outdated in comparison). This means the handling is quite sharp and the drive is quite engaging. The 4-cylinder in the 2.4 is really the only problem here, the car has luxury features but doesn't make up for it in grunt so its not that quick.

I do like this car but its priced close to that of a Lexus IS250 which is RWD and if I wanted a car like this I'd just get a Mazda 3 since I don't need the luxury features.

Pros: Overall a very good car
Cons: Expensive for what it is and what it competes against
Is this helpful? Yes | No

It's Cheap, But Still A Volvo.

front
By: Aleksey10
Overall:
4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars

Performance:
3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars

Build Quality:
3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars

Appearance:
4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars
11/19/2008

I drove this car over a weekend on a road trip as a rental.
And obviously, it was pretty much the lowest spec possible.

The tiny engine didn't give the car much oomph -
understandable when you consider it weighs just shy of two
tons. But it was enough to propel it along the road.
The transmission was brilliant, though, and made good use
of every one of the few horsepowers the engine gave it.
And it managed an average of 34 mpg, with the vast
majority of the thousand or so miles driven being on the
highway, but that's pretty impressive, 'cos that higher than
what a prius would've done on this kind of road.

It felt fairly light and maneuverable, and most importantly in
a volvo, planted. I imagine it's not easy to crash this thing,
and what's even more surprising for a volvo, it handles well.  
That was a pleasant surprise on those twisty roads.

The build quality wasn't quite as exquisite as that on my
lexus, nor on the other volvo we own. But it seemed
sturdy, nothing rattled, and, consistent with volvo's
philosophy, form followed function.The most important kit -
the airbags and safety features weren't options, but
instead, all standard and were still present in this one. And
that's a good thing to know on such a long road trip, and
that it's still a volvo underneath it all.

The back seats aren't terribly roomy, but that's okay - it
isn't a very big car on the outside either.

My only true bone to pick with this car was the fact that
they fitted a pipette for the petrol tank - it only has a range
of around 250 highway miles on one tank (or it did for me),
and it must be tiny - just 10 gal or so.

Pros: It isn't made to be exquisite, and it isn't. It's just a good car.
Cons: There really isn't anything bad about it.
Is this helpful? Yes | No

Everyday Small Car.

dashboard
By: Steve3511
Overall:
4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars

Performance:
3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars

Build Quality:
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars

Appearance:
4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars
06/20/2008

Its practical, small, and sexy. lol.
Good everyday car

Pros: The Handling
Cons: Wicked touchy gas pedal, mushy brakes.
Is this helpful? Yes | No

Super Car

By: Monaro_283
Overall:
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars

Performance:
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars

Build Quality:
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars

Appearance:
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars
10/23/2009

Its just a fantastic car...! it have fantastic engine and a great grip depend for the tires...!
The Bost power is awesom...!
its such an elegant car and is a very fun car to drive...!
the whole car is an ufo...!
the engine sounds like an aircraft engine..!

Pros: Horse Power
Cons: Tires
Is this review helpful? Yes | No

Well Designed, Pacey And Solid

By: Steve3157
Overall:
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars

Performance:
4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars

Build Quality:
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars

Appearance:
4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars
04/23/2008

Great design features, well laid out instruments and controls. Solid build and still quite a rare car. Performance is more than adequate, fuel economy could be better, ride quality and comfort up there with the best. Engine is refined and responsive.

Pros: Build qulity, design, comfort
Cons: Small fuel tank, Boot could be better
Is this review helpful? Yes | No

Sleek, Compact, Sporty Sedan

2008 Volvo S40 2.4i picture
By: Adele90
Overall:
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars

Performance:
4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars

Build Quality:
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars

Appearance:
5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars5 out of 5 stars
04/18/2008

Great little car!

Pros: great handling!!
Cons: Rear passenger space is a little tight.
Is this review helpful? Yes | No
6 reviews found, displaying all reviews.

Rate Your Car

- Share your thoughts!
Rate:
1 of 5 stars2 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars
S40 deals
starting at
$3,995
Rate Your Car
Rate:
1 of 5 stars2 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars
S40
Looking for a Used S40 in your area?
CarGurus has 1,150 Nationwide S40 Listings starting at $3,995.
ZIP: