2000 Toyota Camry LE V6 Reviews
| MSRP: | $22,358 |
| Invoice: | $19,574 |
| Total: | 4 reviews |
| Overall: |
  |
| Performance: |  |
| Appearance: | |
| Build Quality: | |
| Excellent | 1 reviews | |
| Very Good | 1 reviews | |
| Average | 2 reviews | |
| Poor | 0 reviews | |
| Terrible | 0 reviews |
($19000 - $34000)
|
9.
|
Mazda MAZDA6
52 reviews
|
|
10.
|
Pontiac G8
30 reviews
|
|
11.
|
Acura TSX
37 reviews
|
|
12.
|
Volkswagen Jetta
78 reviews
|
|
13.
|
Lexus IS 250
35 reviews
|
|
14.
|
Toyota Camry
158 reviews
|
|
15.
|
Mercedes-Benz C280
18 reviews
|
|
16.
|
Pontiac G6
67 reviews
|
|
17.
|
Volkswagen Passat
55 reviews
|
|
18.
|
Hyundai Sonata
36 reviews
|
|
Used Dodge Charger
134 reviews
|
|
Used Honda Civic
259 reviews
|
|
Used Infiniti G35
61 reviews
|
|
Used Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
48 reviews
|
|
Used Honda Accord
114 reviews
|
|
Used Subaru Impreza
117 reviews
|
|
Used Nissan Altima
83 reviews
|
|
Used Ford Fusion
75 reviews
|
|
Used Nissan Maxima
26 reviews
|
|
Used Subaru Legacy
38 reviews
|
|
Looking for a Used Camry in your area?
CarGurus has 11,871 Nationwide Camry Listings
starting at $1,495.
ZIP:
|
| “Stylish”
By: Jamar2
Overall:
Performance:
Build Quality:
Appearance:
07/09/2009
The acceleration could be a little better, but the breaking is
Pros:
The style
Cons:
n/a
|
| “A Good Car”
By: Mando9
Overall:
Performance:
Build Quality:
Appearance:
01/25/2009
This car walhi is so amazing msa msa i thoght it would be bad but i owned many cars with it msa. This car is model 2000 but i kick some even 2009 cars msa cuz it is 3.5L v6 with high rev. engine msa..
Pros:
the stabilty
Cons:
the clutch
|
| “Not A Bad Starting Car”
By: Viktor117
Overall:
Performance:
Build Quality:
Appearance:
07/28/2008
ITs not the best car around but, its better than most for its price and type. Its very roomy huge trunk around 210hp which is about 40 more than a civic great gas milage (when my parents drive) and no problems also great breaks and you don't feel the bumps in the road too much
Pros:
faster than civics, fusions and accords
Cons:
handaling loose dont feel speed
|
| “Reliable But Far Too Bland...save Yourself.” 
By: Brendan5
Overall:
Performance:
Build Quality:
Appearance:
11/24/2007
This purchase was a reaction to 2.5 years of Volvo ownership. It was reliable but the driver's seat hurt my rear, the front struts needed replacement at 45k and the stick's throws were nearly truck-like. That said, I was just too young for it. I would probably love it if I were approaching 50.
Pros:
Reliable, blends in to its surroundings, quiet and smooth.
Cons:
Handles like a Buick and bland as a Rubbermaid container.
|
Review your car
Upload photos
Start a discussion
Rate Your Car
Copyright © 2006-2009 CarGurus ® LLC, All Rights Reserved.