1986 Chrysler Le Baron Reviews
| MSRP: | Not Listed |
| Invoice: | Not Listed |
| Total: | 10 reviews |
| Overall: |
   |
| Performance: | |
| Appearance: | |
| Build Quality: | |
| Excellent | 3 reviews | |
| Very Good | 1 reviews | |
| Average | 4 reviews | |
| Poor | 2 reviews | |
| Terrible | 0 reviews |
- Specs
- Used Chrysler Le Baron
- Videos
- Chrysler Le Baron Forum
- Repairs
(up to $34000)
|
1.
|
Dodge Charger
134 reviews
|
|
2.
|
Honda Civic
259 reviews
|
|
3.
|
Mazda MAZDA3
133 reviews
|
|
4.
|
Mitsubishi Lancer
111 reviews
|
|
5.
|
Infiniti G35
61 reviews
|
|
6.
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
48 reviews
|
|
7.
|
Honda Accord
114 reviews
|
|
8.
|
Subaru Impreza
117 reviews
|
|
9.
|
Nissan Altima
83 reviews
|
|
10.
|
Ford Fusion
75 reviews
|
|
Used Mazda MAZDA6
52 reviews
|
|
Used Pontiac G8
30 reviews
|
|
Used Ford Focus
200 reviews
|
|
Used Acura TSX
37 reviews
|
|
Used Chevrolet Cobalt
188 reviews
|
|
Used Volkswagen Jetta
78 reviews
|
|
Used Lexus IS 250
35 reviews
|
|
Used Toyota Camry
158 reviews
|
|
Used Pontiac G6
67 reviews
|
|
Used Mercedes-Benz C280
18 reviews
|
|
Looking for a Used Le Baron in your area?
CarGurus has 34 Nationwide Le Baron Listings
starting at $1,995.
ZIP:
|
| “I Still Like It.”
By: Scout
Overall:
Performance:
Build Quality:
Appearance:
04/05/2009
The car is a beautiful burgundy convertible, sporty but sophisticated-looking; not toy-car-like as so many are nowddays. That said, I got it at 114,000 miles and after a year of 35,000 miles driving developed the usual problems every used car gets. I'm getting 30 mpgs but am facing more repair costs. However, the 2.2L turbo still accelerates O.K., the body is rustfree, the interior immaculate. It is still way cheaper than buying a newer car. I wouldn't recommend any car to anybody. They will all break down at some point. Buy what you enjoy looking at and driving.
Pros:
Beautiful car
Cons:
Still needs work
|
| “What Do You Expect From A Free Car??”
By: Anthony1431
Overall:
Performance:
Build Quality:
Appearance:
01/15/2009
One of the worst examples of American automotive engineering EVER. I can't believe they got away with selling this crap. This car was a true P.O.S. My great grandmother loved it, I 'inherited' it. (I wanted it cause it got better gas mileage than the Jeep). Only two good things can be said about it. It ran, and it was great in the snow. Other than that..it SUCKED!
Pros:
Great in snow, got me where I needed to go
Cons:
too many to list.......
|
| “Not Bad.”
By: Al92
Overall:
Performance:
Build Quality:
Appearance:
09/26/2008
I had the turbo convertible model. Not bad as far as looks go. This was one of my first cars, so I can't complain about it too much. But it did have its flaws. I couldn't imagine driving it without the turbo. It was slow even with it. The thing rattled like crazy. The stereo sucked. But the top did go up and down...and that's all I wanted in high school.
Pros:
Drop-Top, Turbo
Cons:
Kinda slow, crappy build qualilty, LOTS of stuff wrong with it.
|
| “1986 Chrysler Lebaron Gts”
By: Ron454
Overall:
Performance:
Build Quality:
Appearance:
07/20/2008
The car was very comfortable. I loved the digital dash. The car got really good gas mileage (for a turbo). Very quick for its age. Repairs were simple and didn't cost too much. The car had decent handling for a four door hatchback.
Pros:
Turbo, Comfortable
Cons:
Driver side window
|
| “Good Car For Getting From Point A To Point B”
By: Colton99
Overall:
Performance:
Build Quality:
Appearance:
06/20/2008
The stereo sucks but that wil change
Pros:
Has good gas mileage but can still get up and go.
Huge trunk could probably fit at least five bodies in it.
Cons:
Not the prettiest thing in the world
|
| “Convertible”
By: Jack845
Overall:
Performance:
Build Quality:
Appearance:
04/02/2008
Fun, Sporty, Four seater
Pros:
Leather, Automatic Top
Cons:
Plastic back window
|
| “Lebaron Gts” 
By: Jon960
Overall:
Performance:
Build Quality:
Appearance:
03/06/2008
was a fun car to drive even with out it being turbo charged.
Pros:
Good on gas, comfortable to drive long distances
Cons:
Again Chrysler's build quality then was poor, Computer problems ect...
|
| “Ugly”
By: Michael1125
Overall:
Performance:
Build Quality:
Appearance:
02/26/2008
it was a black lebaron gts which was turbo-chaged
Pros:
turbo-charged
Cons:
never stayed running! always broke down
|
| “Town & Country Edition Wagon (car In A Crate)”
By: Pierre206
Overall:
Performance:
Build Quality:
Appearance:
02/05/2008
Ugly car but lots of loading capacity, oil burner.
Pros:
loading capacity & place for 5 adults
Cons:
oil burner & good for some laughts
|
| “First Car, Drop Top Though!!”
By: Bobby161
Overall:
Performance:
Build Quality:
Appearance:
01/17/2008
was my first car, everything was very 80s, and very lo-tech except for the electric top which was a cinch to put down. however, 0-60mph in about 15 seconds and compromised back seats made being a teenager awkward (the compartments for the tops hinges took away about 30 percent of the rear seat).
Pros:
drop top, and old people always liked it
Cons:
serious piece of crap
|
Review your car
Upload photos
Start a discussion
Rate Your Car
|
|
Looking for a Used Le Baron in your area?
CarGurus has 34 Nationwide Le Baron Listings
starting at $1,995.
ZIP:
|
Copyright © 2006-2009 CarGurus ® LLC, All Rights Reserved.