2004 Fiat Punto Reviews
| MSRP: | Not Listed |
| Invoice: | Not Listed |
| Total: | 12 reviews |
| Overall: |
   |
| Performance: | |
| Appearance: | |
| Build Quality: | |
| Excellent | 1 reviews | |
| Very Good | 8 reviews | |
| Average | 0 reviews | |
| Poor | 2 reviews | |
| Terrible | 1 reviews |
- Specs
- Used Fiat Punto
- Videos
- Fiat Punto Forum
- Repairs
(up to $34000)
|
1.
|
Dodge Charger
134 reviews
|
|
2.
|
Honda Civic
259 reviews
|
|
3.
|
Mazda MAZDA3
133 reviews
|
|
4.
|
Mitsubishi Lancer
111 reviews
|
|
5.
|
Infiniti G35
61 reviews
|
|
6.
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
48 reviews
|
|
7.
|
Honda Accord
114 reviews
|
|
8.
|
Subaru Impreza
117 reviews
|
|
9.
|
Nissan Altima
83 reviews
|
|
10.
|
Ford Fusion
75 reviews
|
|
Used Mazda MAZDA6
52 reviews
|
|
Used Pontiac G8
30 reviews
|
|
Used Ford Focus
200 reviews
|
|
Used Acura TSX
37 reviews
|
|
Used Chevrolet Cobalt
188 reviews
|
|
Used Volkswagen Jetta
78 reviews
|
|
Used Lexus IS 250
35 reviews
|
|
Used Toyota Camry
158 reviews
|
|
Used Pontiac G6
67 reviews
|
|
Used Mercedes-Benz C280
18 reviews
|
|
Looking for a Used Punto in your area?
CarGurus has thousands of Nationwide Listings
and the tools to find you a great deal.
ZIP:
|
| “Fantastic Everyday Car......great For Wkends Too” 
By: Jean345
Overall:
Performance:
Build Quality:
Appearance:
05/22/2008
It has a 1.2 L 8-valve engine which is very economical and sprinty at the same time. Still i would prefer the 1.2 16v cause it has 20bhp more.
Pros:
Great for parking with city steering mode, ample luggage space, could be transformed into a van with the rear seats down, good handling, good breaking, fuel economy is excellent. Comfortable to drive.
Cons:
Would prefer a more powerful but less economical engine. Take care of the headlamp plastic cover, clean it regularly or it would get smeared by time.
|
| “Ideal First Car, Cheap Insurance, Economical, Fun Factor”
By: Acadia_15971...
Overall:
Performance:
Build Quality:
Appearance:
08/14/2009
its bright yellow and its an active sport 8 valve, the performance isnt great but its really cheap to run and miles per gallon is superb, the build quality isnt bad its light weight it handles, its ideal for my wife being a small car. It has a sports pack, alloys, fogs, body kit, trip computer, sports suspension, bucket seats
Pros:
It turns heads
Cons:
None
|
| “Crap Car” 
By: Mike2446
Overall:
Performance:
Build Quality:
Appearance:
04/07/2009
persomance was crap braking was sloppy handlin back end seems to step out a bit build quality it made a scrapin noise when ppl sat in back back window leaked exhaused dropped off front right brake failed styling was ok looked sporty crap on fuel n was garbage to drive
Pros:
was good to look at
Cons:
crap car
|
| “Usefully Nippy Motor” 
By: Tim628
Overall:
Performance:
Build Quality:
Appearance:
05/04/2008
Not a bad car, bit flimsy, ride is firm but go's round corners quicker than i thought it would. engine is not the most economical when driven with 'enthusiasm' but sounds nice. Brakes are pants, definately needs them upgraded.
Pros:
roomy, nippy, looks god
Cons:
build quality, fuel consumption, brakes
|
| “Not Bad”
By: Matteo57
Overall:
Performance:
Build Quality:
Appearance:
04/04/2008
ok, it's not a real sport car, but i have the HGT version and it's not bad, you can have some fun, good performance and handling for the category, good breaking. Interior well done, my car is 4 years old and no weird "sounds" inside the car. Cheap in diesel.
Pros:
cheap in diesel, ok for 4 people, good performance
Cons:
some detail is not perfect.
|
| “£35 A Year Road Tax, 60mpg! Seriously Cheap To Run!!!” 
By: Si37
Overall:
Performance:
Build Quality:
Appearance:
03/06/2008
2004 Fiat Punto Active Multijet 1.3 Diesel
Pros:
Cheap to run, highly efficient, good top end torque
Cons:
Turbo lag below 2k, not very fast or good handling
|
| “Economical, Cheap To Run And Insure” 
By: Si37
Overall:
Performance:
Build Quality:
Appearance:
02/20/2008
2004 Active Sport, same spec as the Active but with alloy wheels, firmer suspension, sports interior. I've had this car from new, I do 16,000 miles a year and can average anything from 40 - 52 mpg. Cheap to insure, fairly cheap road tax and handles ok. Had a few problems but thats obligatory with Italian cars, didn't help that Arnold Clark are a useless bunch of money grabbing theives who instead of fixing your car, mess it up even more and charge you extortionate prices to get it done. Tyres aren't too bad to buy either. Not the fastest but what do you expect from a 1242cc 8v 60bhp engine?
Pros:
Economical, low insurance group, cheap to maintain, looks better than standard Active
Cons:
Not very fast, Italian build quality not great
|
| “You Get What You Pay For.”
By: Gina156
Overall:
Performance:
Build Quality:
Appearance:
02/20/2008
Fairly cheap and reliable car!
Pros:
Cheap tax and insurance
Cons:
Its a Fiat
|
| “Heavy, Slow Accelerating, Handles Well, And Solid.”
By: Richard1930
Overall:
Performance:
Build Quality:
Appearance:
02/13/2008
The overall size of the car inside is a lot better than it's competitors, the looks are good, however falls short on the performance front. If you're looking for a car to trundle around in, that looks good, hold lots of things and gives a smooth ride, then this is ideal, but if you're looking for extra bursts of speed in this size bracket, this is not for you.
Pros:
Looks, (inside and out), steering, room inside car, and toughness
Cons:
Slow speed and slow accelerating.
|
| “Worst Learner Car Ever.”
By: James1729
Overall:
Performance:
Build Quality:
Appearance:
01/06/2008
not a sharp gearbox, and indicators turned off after a 2 degree turn of the wheel.
Pros:
cheap
Cons:
nasty
|
1, 2 [Next/Last]
Review your car
Upload photos
Start a discussion
Rate Your Car
|
|
Looking for a Used Punto in your area?
CarGurus has thousands of Nationwide Listings
and the tools to find you a great deal.
ZIP:
|
Copyright © 2006-2009 CarGurus ® LLC, All Rights Reserved.