|
Dale writes:
2007 Volvo S80 3.2 Review
Pros28 mpg, looks great, heated and ventilated seats, active bi-xenon headlamps, 18 inch venator rims, 4C active chassis ConsSteering feel is isolated, adequately powered, bobs and weaves like a boat when 4C chassis is set to comfort.
75
Good Highway Cruiser That Eats Up The Miles — I've had this car for about a year now. The 3.2 V6 has adequate power but the driving experience is lacking with uncommunicative steering. Car looks nice and does great on gas (87 octane, 28 mpg). Car also has some of the most comfortable seats I've ever sat in. Driving to San Fran from LA was a wonderful experience.
| ||
|
Patrick writes:
2007 Volvo S80 3.2 Review
ProsEVERYTHING Consnone
35
Awsesome Car — Performance- awesome speed for a V6 Quick to get up and go and stops on a dime Build Quality- Great Quality materials, no probelms what so ever Apperance- Awesome looking car inside and out. We even nicknamed it the shark EXTREMALLY FUN TO DRIVE AND QUICK FOR A V6 IN A LUXURY SEDAN!!! | ||
|
carGrrl writes:
2007 Volvo S80 Review
8,175
Smooth-riding Luxury — I took one of these for a test drive last weekend. I loved the leather seats and great amenities. It drove quite a bit more sportily than my rather dated 850. The combination of safety and style makes this a great car. Owner for 0 years, 0 months Miles Driven per Year:5 | ||
|
Eduardo writes:
2007 Volvo S80 3.2 Review
ProsRide is awsome engine sounds great and handles great Consnot enough horse power for a $42000 V6 and a $50k V8
55
2007 Volvo S80 3.2 — The car looks amazing love the interior exterior performance is not amazing theres V6's with more hp than this for way more cheep handles great with lots of grip Brakes are great havent drivn a car with better ones Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.) | ||
