|
Leann writes:
2003 Land Rover Freelander Review
ProsIt out preformed any "more-suited" suv or truck passing on unpaved and icy back roads. Conswasn't the best quality
85
L R's Are Useful And A Good Choice To Drive In Back-country — It was the best of any during winter. My one complaint was that the design of the seats were uncomfortable. I didn't feel it was the best quality but because it was pre-owned, I am not sure if it was because of mis-use or bad quality- I had to repair major parts before any reasonable time had passed. However. I thanked the performance in winter when it was the only vehicle that made it up certain roads and driveways.... including other 'better' suv's and 4x4 trucks
| ||
|
Rasmus writes:
2003 Land Rover Freelander 2 Dr SE3 AWD SUV Review
ProsGood looking ConsTerrible build quality.
65
The Freelander Is Readily The Worst Car I've Owned — This car is the worst car I've owned. I had it for 14 months and during that time it speant 3 months at the garage getting a total engine rebuild. The car had the following problems: - Bust head gasked - A crack in the head causing coolant to seep inte the number 3 and 4 cylinders. - Continous condensation, creating a small pool of water in the boot. Lost ââ¬10 000 on that car | ||
|
Rowan writes:
2003 Land Rover Freelander Review
Prosspace Consstability
35
A Lay Mans Point Of View — ah can be reliable and expensive to fix always handy for transporting things AND PASsengers is good for having a better view of the road not very agile easy to drive although gear box and handling can be difficult not good for wet weather conditions Primary Use: Utility (towing boats, transporting cargo, etc.) | ||
|
Iain writes:
2003 Land Rover Freelander 4 Dr SE AWD SUV Review
Prosgood handling, good sterio system, heated seats. ConsMPG and reliability issues
65
| ||
|
Vojta writes:
2003 Land Rover Freelander Review
Prosprecious design, good engines, perfect performances in terrain, good position behing the wheel (etc.) ConsTime spent in service
45
Really Good Suv — I think this is the best car in its category. Exterior design is exactly what I want - good-looking, functional, nothing extravangant, but you notice it in the street. Interior is not the nicest, but user friendly - even if the boot is not very large. but there is one big BUT: with this car you spend a lot of time in service - generally nothing serious, but it`s annoying. And for example in Czech Republic servicing is quite expensive. | ||
|
vrod writes:
2003 Land Rover Freelander 4 Dr SE AWD SUV Review
Prosawd Conssmall for a big person 
25
| ||
|
zamentor writes:
2003 Land Rover Freelander 4 Dr HSE AWD SUV Review
ProsLooks good - extremely utilitarian, great touring car. We have crossed the USA three times. ConsHad initial problems with the electrical system, but those teething problems are gone now. 
35
Great Car - It Suits Us Perfectly, I Would Buy It All Over Again In A Heartbeat. — Just perfect for the small family, We've toured extensively and the car is a sure-footed, perfect touring vehicle. We've had her high up in the mountains and in the Canadian snow. Across the Mohave desert and in New York city traffic. She's our all-purpose go-everywhere funtastic little SUV. Primary Use: Family transportation | ||
|
Daniel writes:
2003 Land Rover Freelander 2 Dr SE3 AWD SUV Review
ProsFreelander TD4...... Stunning!!! ConsWhat??????
35
Td4 You Sexy Thang!!! — TD4 - Performance awsum for a diesel Love the look, style. Lotza fun to drive Light on Diesel Most fun I had on 4 wheels Awsum when you remove the hard top, for a wind in your hair exp. Da Bomb Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.) | ||
|
James writes:
2003 Land Rover Freelander 4 Dr HSE AWD SUV Review
ProsEverything about my car is awesome, Love it, And Proud to Own 1 ConsNothing..
35
|
|
Looking for a Used Freelander in your area?
CarGurus has 172 nationwide Freelander listings
starting at $3,450.
|