Average Ratings from 4 reviews
- Performance:
- Appearance:
- Build Quality:
- Overall:
|
Dan writes:
2002 Land Rover Range Rover 4.6 HSE Review
Prosimage Conseverything else
55
Range Rovers Break Alot — It breaks alot but looks fantastic and gives a sense of occasion each time you get in it, is horrendously uneconomical, costs a fortune to service and even more when it breaks down, which it does really rather alot! The dog likes it though and I can look down on all the poor people!
| ||
|
Mohammad364 writes:
2002 Land Rover Range Rover 4.6 HSE Review
ProsMaybe it's a little spacious.... Cons- Complains alot
95
Terrible In Every Aspect — I have drove alot of cars and this is by far one of the worst cars I have ever driven, the onboard computer beeps and complains on almost anything, it was my first try for Range Rover and it was by far the worst impression I was able to get from it. | ||
|
RRlover writes:
2002 Land Rover Range Rover 4.6 HSE Review
ProsReliable, comfortable, and looks are timeless. ConsFuel economy and the cargo area could have been larger, but it would not allow me to climb mountains due to the incline degree needed for off road expeditions. 
35
Uk At Its Finest Hour — I wish the fuel economy was better especially since other suvs have been able to make engines with better fuel milage. Over all I believe that the 2002 P38 was the last of the RR that are flawless in looks and electrical problems that the ones before it and after it have come to experience. This one/year was the flagship! Primary Use: Family transportation | ||
|
Smuj writes:
2002 Land Rover Range Rover Review
ProsLooks amazing, comands respect on the road. ConsJuicy, a bit of a pain to park, costly to maintain.
35
|
