2002 Land Rover Range Rover User Reviews

2002 Land Rover Range Rover Review Ratings

  • Rank your car

Average Ratings from 6 reviews

  • Performance:3.3 out of 5 stars3.3 out of 5 stars3.3 out of 5 stars3.3 out of 5 stars3.3 out of 5 stars 3.3 / 5
  • Appearance:4.3 out of 5 stars4.3 out of 5 stars4.3 out of 5 stars4.3 out of 5 stars4.3 out of 5 stars 4.3 / 5
  • Build Quality:3.3 out of 5 stars3.3 out of 5 stars3.3 out of 5 stars3.3 out of 5 stars3.3 out of 5 stars 3.3 / 5
  • Overall: 4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars 4 / 5

Review Highlights Click to filter reviews below

PROS
"comfortable car" 2 reviews
"power" 2 reviews
CONS
"fuel economy" 3 reviews
"expensive car" 2 reviews

User Reviews

Displaying all 6 2002 Land Rover Range Rover reviews.

Mike writes:
2002 Land Rover Range Rover 4.6 HSE Review
Back Seats:
Cargo Capacity:
Family Car:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Overall:
5

Pros

A beutiful, elegant yet rugged vehicle. Only 100 made.

Cons

Gas mileage suffers due to AWD SUV. Maintainence and repairs can be costly.

35

Classy, Elegant, Uniquely Stylish And Handsomely Rugged — I love the unique color and look of this Range Rover. It is loaded with all of Land Rover's options for 2002 including NAV, multiplay CD, Airbag shocks for automatic leveling, stainless steel exhaust and specially stitched interior with just the right amount of wood trim to make it feel warm and comfy. Since I don't put many miles on my cars, it should hold it's value well and gas prices/fuel economy don't really affect me much. The usual British gremlins are sure to make themselves known but since I have worked through most of them with my '01 it shouldn't be a problem to keep up with them

Primary Use: Family transportation

1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
RRlover writes:
2002 Land Rover Range Rover 4.6 HSE Review
Accessories:
Battery Life:
Brakes:
Back Seats:
Cargo Capacity:
Daily Commute:
Family Car:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Interior Noise:
Interior Space:
Long Trips:
Maintenance Cost:
Off-Road:
Parking:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Ride Comfort:
Safety:
Looks/Style:
Visibility:
Warranty:
Weight:
Overall:
4

Pros

Reliable, comfortable, and looks are timeless.

Cons

Fuel economy and the cargo area could have been larger, but it would not allow me to climb mountains due to the incline degree needed for off road expeditions.

RRlover
45

Uk At Its Finest Hour — I wish the fuel economy was better especially since other suvs have been able to make engines with better fuel milage. Over all I believe that the 2002 P38 was the last of the RR that are flawless in looks and electrical problems that the ones before it and after it have come to experience. This one/year was the flagship!

Primary Use: Family transportation

2 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
Mohammad364 writes:
2002 Land Rover Range Rover 4.6 HSE Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
1

Pros

Maybe it's a little spacious....

Cons

- Complains alot
- Very lazy torque
- Feels very loose
- Smells funny

105

Terrible In Every Aspect — I have drove alot of cars and this is by far one of the worst cars I have ever driven, the onboard computer beeps and complains on almost anything, it was my first try for Range Rover and it was by far the worst impression I was able to get from it.

2 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
Dan writes:
2002 Land Rover Range Rover 4.6 HSE Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
5

Pros

image

Cons

everything else

55

Range Rovers Break Alot — It breaks alot but looks fantastic and gives a sense of occasion each time you get in it, is horrendously uneconomical, costs a fortune to service and even more when it breaks down, which it does really rather alot! The dog likes it though and I can look down on all the poor people!

2 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
GQHOOD writes:
2002 Land Rover Range Rover 4.6 HSE Review
Back Seats:
Cargo Capacity:
Family Car:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Overall:
4

Pros

Stylish, luxurious, roomy, extremely capable. No matter where you're at, this Classic P38 Range Rover turns heads. Maintained this beauty & it'll last you a lifetime.

Cons

Gas guzzler.

GQHOOD
45

Luxurious,excellent, Capable, Great Classic Modern Design Suv — It has pretty good Overall acceleration, if you want that extra power just switch to sport mode & smash the pedal. Once the car is moving it quickly accelerates. Braking is surprisingly great for a large SUV. I manage to get 17 MPG highway driving at 70 MPH and between 13-15 city driving, not bad at all for this full time 4x4 gas guzzler! Gets better mileage than a Lincoln Navigator. I've owned this Range Rover for a few months and it hasn't given me any problems. The Rover has been serviced at the dealership for the past 11 years by the previous owner. These Rovers need to be looked after constantly to make sure nothing breaks or it will cost a hefty price to fix.

Primary Use: Family transportation

1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
Smuj writes:
2002 Land Rover Range Rover Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
5

Pros

Looks amazing, comands respect on the road.

Cons

Juicy, a bit of a pain to park, costly to maintain.

35

44i Java Black Vogue With Oxford Tan Leather — All round crazy looking ride, 20" Supercharged alloys, Supercharged extras all around.

0 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No

Displaying all 6 2002 Land Rover Range Rover reviews.

Rank your car

Reviews From Other Years

1976 Land Rover Range Rover Reviews

I Miss The Old Girl :-( By Gavin

I love the look of these old 2 door Range Rovers. Usually down at the stern and they make a great noise with that lovely old V8. Mine was rotten the previous owner had used Paper Mache to make it loo... Read More

Read all 1976 Land Rover Range Rover reviews

1978 Land Rover Range Rover Reviews

The Ultimate Access Machine Lol By Peter

Typical Land Rover, English engineering but still the BEST 4X4XFAR The Family has great fun in it we go places that not a lot of others have been and see some magnificent sites. We also get to camp ... Read More

Read all 1978 Land Rover Range Rover reviews

1979 Land Rover Range Rover Reviews

The Best 4x4xfar - Awesome By Tristan

What a beast! The 3.5 V8 was a little down on power but this thing would still go up the side of a house in low box. Great fun to drive and very capable for it's age. Read More

Read all 1979 Land Rover Range Rover reviews

1980 Land Rover Range Rover Reviews

Costs By Alfred

Just got the out most of it in 4x4 driving but it was an oldie with twin carburaters,too much cost in petrol.handling was perfect ,it really was fun to drive.My main problem was a gas leak in the tank... Read More

Read all 1980 Land Rover Range Rover reviews

1984 Land Rover Range Rover Reviews

Just An Excellent Machine By Lars

Great fun for off roading, I bought her on the cheap as a project to work on evenings. The soft spring rates and lack of anti-roll bars make it interesting to go round roundabouts to say the least. Th... Read More

Read all 1984 Land Rover Range Rover reviews

People researching a 2002 Land Rover Range Rover contacted a dealer about

Picture of 2002 Land Rover Range Rover, exterior
Land Rover Range Rover
38% of the time
Toyota Sequoia
6% of the time
Jeep Grand Cherokee
6% of the time
Land Rover Discovery
5% of the time
Range Rover
Looking for a Used Range Rover in your area?
CarGurus has 2,952 nationwide Range Rover listings starting at $3,190.
ZIP: