2000 Volvo V40 User Reviews

2000 Volvo V40 Review Ratings

  • Rank your car

Average Ratings from 13 reviews

  • Performance:3.6 out of 5 stars3.6 out of 5 stars3.6 out of 5 stars3.6 out of 5 stars3.6 out of 5 stars 3.6 / 5
  • Appearance:3.5 out of 5 stars3.5 out of 5 stars3.5 out of 5 stars3.5 out of 5 stars3.5 out of 5 stars 3.5 / 5
  • Build Quality:4.1 out of 5 stars4.1 out of 5 stars4.1 out of 5 stars4.1 out of 5 stars4.1 out of 5 stars 4.1 / 5
  • Overall: 4.2 out of 5 stars4.2 out of 5 stars4.2 out of 5 stars4.2 out of 5 stars4.2 out of 5 stars 4.2 / 5

Review Highlights Click to filter reviews below

PROS
"comfortable car" 6 reviews
"ride" 4 reviews
"power" 4 reviews
"fuel economy" 3 reviews
"reliable car" 2 reviews
CONS
"small power" 3 reviews

User Reviews

Displaying 1 - 10 of 13 2000 Volvo V40 reviews.

writes:
2000 Volvo V40 4 Dr Turbo Wagon Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Pros

Drives very well. Well equipped

Cons

Gear Selectors wear.

415

2000 Volvo V40 4 Dr Turbo Wagon — Peformance: Very smooth, reasonably quick. Brakes are good, Handling nice and tight, unexpectedly good. Build Quality: All good. Appearence: Very nice, discreet. Cost of ownership: Good on fuel and cheap to insure Fun Factor: Lots of fun, more so probably because it is better than expected

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

3 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
writes:
2000 Volvo V40 Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Pros

Capable everyday "go to the supermarket" car

Cons

Not much

35

Ok Car — Although the V40 is a perfectly competent car--a very good car, even--nothing about its dynamic performance stood out, grabbed us, and said, "Drive me!" The V40 isn't an enthusiast's car, and it's not a Volvo enthusiast's car. Its interior looked like a Volvo, and the seats were definitely Volvo, but, overall, the car didn't have the quirky character one expects of a Volvo. It felt like a Mitsubishi masquerading as a Volvo, which is what it is.

Primary Use: Commuting to work

0 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
writes:
2000 Volvo V40 Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Pros

useful

Cons

Tired after 10 years and 116000 miles.

45

Volvo V40 — Short term purchase between compnay car and new car. Cost £1k, ran for 6 months, cost £200 to get thru MOT, then traded in for £250. Served it's purpose but no more. Decent load lugger and work horse, but no style or performance icon.

Primary Use: Utility (towing boats, transporting cargo, etc.)

0 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
writes:
2000 Volvo V40 4 Dr Turbo Wagon Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Pros

Fast stylish and usefull

Cons

constantly in need of repair

35

00' Volvo V40 1.9t — The car was a handful always fixing one thing and another thing would fail or break or short. It was a surprisingly quick car although the turbo could have done better than it did but the car lived a good 8 years of abuse and high mileage and finally took an end at 237,696 mi. so... in my opinion that was long enough.

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
writes:
2000 Volvo V40 Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Pros

Comfort, reliability, Bullet proof feel

Cons

Expensive servicing

25

Volvo V40 1.8s — I got the Volvo V40 after owning a Renault Scenic (which was abysmal) I thought it was a great cat with good performance despite the fact it was only a 1.8. It was incredibly reliable and comfortable. Had to go because it made the missus sick on long journeys (she preferred the elevated position in the Scenic)

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
writes:
2000 Volvo V40 Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Pros

drives well

Cons

lookin old now

55

My Car — drives ok good mpg reliable never cost too much to fix when it goes wrong not that thats very often interior but dated easy to drive comfortable ride for driver and passengers loads and loads of space o k stereo with both cd and tape would buy again or upgrade to new v70

3 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
writes:
2000 Volvo V40 Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Pros

Good space inside, good driving comfort, tight performance.

Cons

Short on power,

25

Fantastic Family Car. — Bought it becouse we are a family of five. Need space in the backseats. Did not buy it for horsepower or anything. Just needed a bigger car. It is a solid car, made for family driving and hollidays. A car perfectly for us. (As a family spoken:). Hoping for a muscle car. Dream car. absolutely Chevrolet Corvette 1969 Stingray.

0 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
writes:
2000 Volvo V40 4 Dr Turbo Wagon Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Pros

Comfortable, safe, roomy, stylish. good MPG. Legendary volvo depreciation makes for a good seconhand buy!

Cons

Poor performance. Harsh handling. Poor climate control systems. Expensive parts and repair.

205

Nice Alternative To A Boring Sedan Or Suv — This car is actually at Misubishi platform from japan/europe which volvo adopted and refined, which may explain its very sleek, sexy, un-volvo looks. Sadly for some, its performance doesn't quite live up to its sporty looks. The car's poor little 1.8l turbocharged engine could do with another .2 or more liters to help it along IMHO. Inside, its all volvo with a very functional and comfortable interior. Front seats are super comfortable and supportive leather. Rear seats are also supportive, but legroom is limited for some. Decent trunk size combined with fold down rear seats and fold flat fron passenger seat give this car a vast hauling capacity. On the road this car is very pleasant and effortless to drive. Its claimed 8.2 second 0-60 is not apparent due to the smooth shifting auto and quiet engine. Car seems much more lethargic than it actually is. Handling is fairly decent to harsh for its size, with more than average understeer and body roll. Fuel economy averages low to mid 20s with mostly city driving and AC on all the time. Very decent for a car this size.

2 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
writes:
2000 Volvo V40 4 Dr Turbo Wagon Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
35

Sensible, Old Man Car — Love the slight bit of stealth performance combined with the ability to carry lots of beer back from Belgium. Hate the fuel economy these days

1 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
writes:
2000 Volvo V40 Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Pros

Great comfort.

Cons

Slow acceleration.

45

Drive Like A King. — Had it for three years and it was a pleasure to drive but my 1.8 was short of acceleration.

1 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No

Displaying 1 - 10 of 13 2000 Volvo V40 reviews.

Rank your car

Reviews From Other Years

2003 Volvo V40 Reviews

God Car By Martin

a bit slow to accellerate has a smaller turn ratio than my golf II Matinance is easy looks rael nige fuel consumption is 10l pr 100 km cost araund 200 euro pr year to maintain (first year) YES I'S ... Read More

V40 Delight By MacGarver

I bought this car initially for my wife to drive our kids around. However, with the price of gas hitting all time highs, it quickly replaced my SUV and became my daily commuter. I bought it used (a le... Read More

Read all 6 2003 Volvo V40 reviews

2002 Volvo V40 Reviews

Great Car By joshwalter

A really great car that is fund to drive. It is very reliable and rides well. The cost of ownership is low. We've keep thorough records and always used the top oil for maintenance. I highly recomm... Read More

Read all 2002 Volvo V40 reviews

2001 Volvo V40 Reviews

Nice Family Car, Enough Storage For Three, Get The Horrizontal Roof Rack It Helps, By sportfamily1

Lots of turbo lag at low rpms. Confort in driver seat is les than desireable, all the others are perfect. Only seats two adults in back, but what do you expect from a entry level sedan wagon. But once... Read More

What Is That? A Toyota, A Ford? "no, It's A Volvo!" By Andrew

Performance: When tuned up properly and serviced regularly, even tho' it's only a "low pressure" Turbo, it ROCKS! Build Quality: What you would expect from the "entry level" of the Volvo line...it tri... Read More

Read all 9 2001 Volvo V40 reviews

1998 Volvo V40 Reviews

Brilliant Car Would Be Reluctant To Sell By Daz

what can i say i love it , she has the lot heated seats , leather , just great .This car is a good all rounder it has all what a family could need and all what a single guy could want , it has the l... Read More

Read all 1998 Volvo V40 reviews

1997 Volvo V40 Reviews

1997 Volvo V40 By David

Peformance: Very smooth, reasonably quick. Brakes are good, Handling nice and tight, unexpectedly good. Build Quality: All good. Appearence: Very nice, discreet. Cost of ownership: Good on fuel and ch... Read More

Read all 1997 Volvo V40 reviews

People researching a 2000 Volvo V40 contacted a dealer about

Subaru Forester
11% of the time
Volvo V70
11% of the time
Subaru Outback
11% of the time
Picture of 2000 Volvo V40, exterior
Volvo V40
7% of the time
V40
Looking for a Used V40 in your area?
CarGurus has 61 nationwide V40 listings starting at $2,990.
ZIP: