2000 Volvo V40 User Reviews

2000 Volvo V40 Review Ratings

  • Rank your car

Average Ratings from 13 reviews

  • Performance:3.6 out of 5 stars3.6 out of 5 stars3.6 out of 5 stars3.6 out of 5 stars3.6 out of 5 stars 3.6 / 5
  • Appearance:3.5 out of 5 stars3.5 out of 5 stars3.5 out of 5 stars3.5 out of 5 stars3.5 out of 5 stars 3.5 / 5
  • Build Quality:4.1 out of 5 stars4.1 out of 5 stars4.1 out of 5 stars4.1 out of 5 stars4.1 out of 5 stars 4.1 / 5
  • Overall: 4.2 out of 5 stars4.2 out of 5 stars4.2 out of 5 stars4.2 out of 5 stars4.2 out of 5 stars 4.2 / 5

Review Highlights Click to filter reviews below

PROS
"comfortable car" 6 reviews
"ride" 4 reviews
"power" 4 reviews
"fuel economy" 3 reviews
"reliable car" 2 reviews
CONS
"small power" 3 reviews

User Reviews

Displaying 1 - 10 of 13 2000 Volvo V40 reviews.

Julien writes:
2000 Volvo V40 Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
5

Pros

drives well

Cons

lookin old now

55

My Car — drives ok good mpg reliable never cost too much to fix when it goes wrong not that thats very often interior but dated easy to drive comfortable ride for driver and passengers loads and loads of space o k stereo with both cd and tape would buy again or upgrade to new v70

3 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
David writes:
2000 Volvo V40 4 Dr Turbo Wagon Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
4

Pros

Drives very well. Well equipped

Cons

Gear Selectors wear.

385

2000 Volvo V40 4 Dr Turbo Wagon — Peformance: Very smooth, reasonably quick. Brakes are good, Handling nice and tight, unexpectedly good. Build Quality: All good. Appearence: Very nice, discreet. Cost of ownership: Good on fuel and cheap to insure Fun Factor: Lots of fun, more so probably because it is better than expected

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

3 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
Jon writes:
2000 Volvo V40 4 Dr Turbo Wagon Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
5

Pros

smooth ride, fast, quiet

Cons

expensive repairs

25

Very Nice Ride, Fast For A Wagon — very good accleration, the low pressure turbo adds a good long boost at bout 2,000 rpm

0 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
Lars writes:
2000 Volvo V40 Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
5

Pros

Great comfort.

Cons

Slow acceleration.

45

Drive Like A King. — Had it for three years and it was a pleasure to drive but my 1.8 was short of acceleration.

1 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
David8744 writes:
2000 Volvo V40 4 Dr Turbo Wagon Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
5
35

Sensible, Old Man Car — Love the slight bit of stealth performance combined with the ability to carry lots of beer back from Belgium. Hate the fuel economy these days

1 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
Aaron writes:
2000 Volvo V40 4 Dr Turbo Wagon Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
3

Pros

Comfortable, safe, roomy, stylish. good MPG. Legendary volvo depreciation makes for a good seconhand buy!

Cons

Poor performance. Harsh handling. Poor climate control systems. Expensive parts and repair.

195

Nice Alternative To A Boring Sedan Or Suv — This car is actually at Misubishi platform from japan/europe which volvo adopted and refined, which may explain its very sleek, sexy, un-volvo looks. Sadly for some, its performance doesn't quite live up to its sporty looks. The car's poor little 1.8l turbocharged engine could do with another .2 or more liters to help it along IMHO. Inside, its all volvo with a very functional and comfortable interior. Front seats are super comfortable and supportive leather. Rear seats are also supportive, but legroom is limited for some. Decent trunk size combined with fold down rear seats and fold flat fron passenger seat give this car a vast hauling capacity. On the road this car is very pleasant and effortless to drive. Its claimed 8.2 second 0-60 is not apparent due to the smooth shifting auto and quiet engine. Car seems much more lethargic than it actually is. Handling is fairly decent to harsh for its size, with more than average understeer and body roll. Fuel economy averages low to mid 20s with mostly city driving and AC on all the time. Very decent for a car this size.

2 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
Odd-Erik writes:
2000 Volvo V40 Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
5

Pros

Good space inside, good driving comfort, tight performance.

Cons

Short on power,

25

Fantastic Family Car. — Bought it becouse we are a family of five. Need space in the backseats. Did not buy it for horsepower or anything. Just needed a bigger car. It is a solid car, made for family driving and hollidays. A car perfectly for us. (As a family spoken:). Hoping for a muscle car. Dream car. absolutely Chevrolet Corvette 1969 Stingray.

0 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
Steve writes:
2000 Volvo V40 Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
3

Pros

useful

Cons

Tired after 10 years and 116000 miles.

45

Volvo V40 — Short term purchase between compnay car and new car. Cost £1k, ran for 6 months, cost £200 to get thru MOT, then traded in for £250. Served it's purpose but no more. Decent load lugger and work horse, but no style or performance icon.

Primary Use: Utility (towing boats, transporting cargo, etc.)

0 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
Per-Ole writes:
2000 Volvo V40 Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
4

Pros

Capable everyday "go to the supermarket" car

Cons

Not much

35

Ok Car — Although the V40 is a perfectly competent car--a very good car, even--nothing about its dynamic performance stood out, grabbed us, and said, "Drive me!" The V40 isn't an enthusiast's car, and it's not a Volvo enthusiast's car. Its interior looked like a Volvo, and the seats were definitely Volvo, but, overall, the car didn't have the quirky character one expects of a Volvo. It felt like a Mitsubishi masquerading as a Volvo, which is what it is.

Primary Use: Commuting to work

0 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
mikey2me writes:
2000 Volvo V40 4 Dr Turbo Wagon Review
Back Seats:
Cargo Capacity:
Family Car:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Overall:
4

Pros

Just bought it and its my second Swede; had Saab. Great comfort but scared of negative ownership reviews.

Cons

Maintenance looks expensive

mikey2me
65

Easy To Drive, Semi Luxurious And A Good Fit For Me. — Nice little wagon with upscale looks and safety features. I think its very distinctive and relatively rare on the road. I also like supporting my Scandinavian heritage. After all, they explored North America first!! Go Leif!! Go Volvo! Just Bloody Go! The lights not getting any greener.....

1 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No

Displaying 1 - 10 of 13 2000 Volvo V40 reviews.

Rank your car

Reviews From Other Years

1997 Volvo V40 Reviews

1997 Volvo V40 By David

Peformance: Very smooth, reasonably quick. Brakes are good, Handling nice and tight, unexpectedly good. Build Quality: All good. Appearence: Very nice, discreet. Cost of ownership: Good on fuel and ch... Read More

Read all 1997 Volvo V40 reviews

1998 Volvo V40 Reviews

Brilliant Car Would Be Reluctant To Sell By Daz

what can i say i love it , she has the lot heated seats , leather , just great .This car is a good all rounder it has all what a family could need and all what a single guy could want , it has the l... Read More

Read all 1998 Volvo V40 reviews

2001 Volvo V40 Reviews

Nice Family Car, Enough Storage For Three, Get The Horrizontal Roof Rack It Helps, By sportfamily1

Lots of turbo lag at low rpms. Confort in driver seat is les than desireable, all the others are perfect. Only seats two adults in back, but what do you expect from a entry level sedan wagon. But once... Read More

What Is That? A Toyota, A Ford? "no, It's A Volvo!" By Andrew

Performance: When tuned up properly and serviced regularly, even tho' it's only a "low pressure" Turbo, it ROCKS! Build Quality: What you would expect from the "entry level" of the Volvo line...it tri... Read More

Read all 9 2001 Volvo V40 reviews

2002 Volvo V40 Reviews

Great Car By joshwalter

A really great car that is fund to drive. It is very reliable and rides well. The cost of ownership is low. We've keep thorough records and always used the top oil for maintenance. I highly recomm... Read More

Read all 2002 Volvo V40 reviews

2003 Volvo V40 Reviews

God Car By Martin

a bit slow to accellerate has a smaller turn ratio than my golf II Matinance is easy looks rael nige fuel consumption is 10l pr 100 km cost araund 200 euro pr year to maintain (first year) YES I'S ... Read More

V40 Delight By MacGarver

I bought this car initially for my wife to drive our kids around. However, with the price of gas hitting all time highs, it quickly replaced my SUV and became my daily commuter. I bought it used (a le... Read More

Read all 6 2003 Volvo V40 reviews

People researching a 2000 Volvo V40 contacted a dealer about

Subaru Forester
11% of the time
Volvo V70
11% of the time
Subaru Outback
11% of the time
Saab 9-3
7% of the time
V40
Looking for a Used V40 in your area?
CarGurus has 65 nationwide V40 listings starting at $2,400.
ZIP: