Average Ratings from 8 reviews
- Performance:
- Appearance:
- Build Quality:
- Overall:
Review Highlights Click to filter reviews below
|
Jan writes:
1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class 2 Dr CLK320 Convertible Review
ProsGreat reliable motoring ConsChanging spark plugs. It has 12 and you need small hands with good dexterity to change the plugs!
115
My Wife's Dream Car. — How to look good with your top off! Well built, solid car, low maintenance cost and timeless styling. Great value and great build quality. Gas mileage is not great, but it has a good fun factor and offers very comfortable cruising on the highway. Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)
| ||
|
Matthew writes:
1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class 2 Dr CLK320 Coupe Review
Prosacceleration, ride quality, looks, bose stereo Conscould be faster, one of the subs rattles
45
Clk320 — i really like this car. its pretty fast and it also has really good speakers for just a stock car. i havnt fully tested it out yet but it seems like a good solid car. i like how it looks and i just think its pretty cool because its a Benz that was only 3K... | ||
|
Andrew writes:
1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class 2 Dr CLK320 Coupe Review
ProsComfort and style ConsI would rather have the convertible.
35
I Love My Car!!! — I got this car from my dad who bought the car new. I love this car. It has 218,000 miles on it and still runs perfectly. It's only a V-6, so it's not the fastest thing on the road, but for what it is it's fast and efficient. The gas mileage is really good, I generally get about 27 miles to the gallon. | ||
|
A.j. writes:
1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class 2 Dr CLK320 Coupe Review
Prosgreat handling Consnone
25
Great — its a great car my brother ers put in a great sound sistem in it i think its agood car it has 312 horsepower it hasnt needed repairs and its fun to drive its apperence is great and it doesnt squek or rattle Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.) | ||
|
H.R. writes:
1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class 2 Dr CLK320 Convertible Review
ProsFlash ConsKinda old
25
Unremarkable — Nice but doesn't come alive until your speed rises to levels that aren't welcomed in the US. Up until then, not as good as the Subaru - particularly the handling which is arthritic. Overall, rather stiff and staid - just really not that athletic. Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.) | ||
|
Chelsea writes:
1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class 2 Dr CLK320 Coupe Review
Prossexy lookin Consexpensive
35
The Maintenance Pains Aren't Worth It, Get A Honda — decent acceleration,great breaking, poor handling build quality?Ha only thing quality is engine. looks good outside, interiors falling appart costs?! out the roof! 27 mpg but $10k spent to maintain in the past 3 years. The head turns make it fun to drive tho Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.) | ||
|
Phil writes:
1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class 2 Dr CLK430 Coupe Review
ProsV8 tops out at 200mph Consbad on gas
35
Nicest Sports Car In Its Class — Its a AMG 4.30 liter cant beat that! I love that you can go through the back seat into the trunk... if Ur small enough. It will feel like Ur driving a sports car...Well U R driving a sport car. who doesn't like a sports car if you go a extra 60k go buy one. | ||
|
Looking for a Used CLK-Class in your area?
CarGurus has 1,863 nationwide CLK-Class listings
starting at $3,499.
|