|
David writes:
1996 Vauxhall Omega Review
ProsEconomical, Reliable, Smooth, Spacious ConsMany have high miles and cabin rattles.
325
1996 Vauxhall Omega — Performance: Not quick 2.0 maybe a bit too small, brakes nice and strong, handling a bit barge like, but feels safe. Build Quality: Fair, Not too bad, but not as good as a 5 Series. Appearance: Nice condition, and a nice colour. Cost of Ownership: Good on fuel and cheap insurence. Fun Factor: Ok, feels very safe if you get a bit too enthusiastic. Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.) |
|
Phil writes:
1996 Vauxhall Omega Review
ProsRear wheel drive, huge power ConsI will blow you off the road
25
Cool As... — Massive acceleration after engine and exhaust upgrades (powerflow exhaust manifold back), extreme breaking due to red stuff pads and drilled discs... and could fit a single devan bed in the boot inc mattress and shut the tail gate! and it was rear wheel drive! V6 RULES! Primary Use: Commuting to work |
|
Kirsten writes:
1996 Vauxhall Omega Review
Prosperformance, handling, comfort Consrunning costs steep, but not for luxury car, depreciation awful
25
Awesome Luxury Car For Money — 2.5tdi cdx, good performance from bmw engine and great handling thanks to rear wheel drive. Fully loaded kit wise, very comfortable, great cruiser, excellent boot size, running costs not cheap but not as bad as you think 30 mpg. Only really bad thing was depreciation. |