1992 Ford Thunderbird User Reviews

1992 Ford Thunderbird Review Ratings

  • Rank your car

Average Ratings from 11 reviews

  • Performance:3.8 out of 5 stars3.8 out of 5 stars3.8 out of 5 stars3.8 out of 5 stars3.8 out of 5 stars 3.8 / 5
  • Appearance:3.8 out of 5 stars3.8 out of 5 stars3.8 out of 5 stars3.8 out of 5 stars3.8 out of 5 stars 3.8 / 5
  • Build Quality:4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars 4 / 5
  • Overall: 4.3 out of 5 stars4.3 out of 5 stars4.3 out of 5 stars4.3 out of 5 stars4.3 out of 5 stars 4.3 / 5

Review Highlights Click to filter reviews below

PROS
"ride" 4 reviews
"comfortable car" 3 reviews
"handling" 3 reviews
"fuel economy" 3 reviews
"speed" 2 reviews
CONS
"fuel economy" 3 reviews

User Reviews

Displaying 1 - 10 of 11 1992 Ford Thunderbird reviews.

Erika writes:
1992 Ford Thunderbird SC Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
5

Pros

very roomy

Cons

noisey

45

Fast — This is the most fun I have ever had with a car. The mustang is great in all but this car has my heart.

1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
fshrmn1995 writes:
1992 Ford Thunderbird Base Review
Back Seats:
Cargo Capacity:
Family Car:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Overall:
5

Pros

Good gas millage, Comfortable car, Great acceleration

Cons

Not much room in back seats

fshrmn1995
25

Awesome And Comfortable Car — I really think this is a good car and I would recommend this car to anyone. This is my first car and I don't think that I would get rid of this car for a long time. This is really a nice car.

Primary Use: Family transportation

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
Carlos writes:
1992 Ford Thunderbird Sport Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
3

Pros

it cheap and good for mild thrills

Cons

the car is cheaply made

25

Only Get The 5.0 V8 Version — the engine is the only thing that made me love this car everything else was jus too poorly designed. It was fun too drive from time too time but the weight ratio became a problem so thats pretty much it

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
Leslie146 writes:
1992 Ford Thunderbird LX Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
4

Pros

Comfy

Cons

Slow

35

My First Thunderbird — Good car ran well

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
Chris writes:
1992 Ford Thunderbird SC Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
3

Pros

cheap. quick. burnouts. drift. rwd

Cons

ford

25

Not Too Bad — not a ford person. good acel nice burnouts one wheel peel the cars 0-60 is nice, hauls ass in second gear. well worth the 600 i paid. fun car. transmission break fast. engines dont last long. not good winter cars

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

0 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
Jason writes:
1992 Ford Thunderbird Base Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
5

Pros

A reliable and fun car that has a great ride and feel.

Cons

The car is older now, and gas mileage isn't amazing.

25

If You're Lucky Enough To Own One, You'll Know Why It's Loved. — Performance is a bit sub-par for this car, but it's to be expected with a underpowered base model. From experience, acceleration is slow at slower speeds but it does pick up faster in the higher gears. It can hit 180 kph, and I've seen it last for a few hours on extended runs between 140-160 kph. Braking feels good for its size, and the handling is fairly responsive. One thing to note (as I live in a cold climate) is that this car seems to start no matter how cold it is. I've never had it not plugged in when colder than -30C, but at this temperature it turns over without a problem. Build quality is great. No problems so far, but the lower mileage may be the reason for this. The interior is nice, with the only drawback being no cupholders. The car feels solid no matter the speed you drive at, and nothing in the car feels flimsy. The appearance is drop-dead sexy. I've looked at earlier and later T-birds (80's up) and this one seems to have the right amount of flair. The front end styling on the 90-92s seems more proper for this car compared to the 93s and later. This car is just class, all around. Cost of Ownership is good. My maintenance on the car is lower than it should be due to a busy life, but there have been no problems. It's a domestic so parts aren't a concern. Gas mileage isn't bad for a V-6 of its age either. Fun Factor: For what this car was built to be, it's great. Handling is fantastic, interior noise is low, the ride is great even on gravel roads. As someone else put it, it's hard not to keep from speeding in it. I've talked with a few other T-bird owners after they see my car, and I have yet to hear anything bad about their overall experiences with these birds.

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
Johnny writes:
1992 Ford Thunderbird SC Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
5

Pros

fast, good handling, a lot of fun, looks better then most other models

Cons

kinda bad on gas, expensive to repair and upgrade, has some things on it that break pretty easy

35

Awsome Car For The Price — Quick car for its age, and even tho its pretty bad on gas it's still better then most vehicles that can keep up to it. It's ride is kinda rough but usually people that buy this car wouldn't care (at least they shouldn't), seeing as how it helps to corner a lot better that way.

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
William writes:
1992 Ford Thunderbird LX Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
5

Pros

Reliability, super durable construction, fast top speed, extremely low drag coeffecient

Cons

don't make too many performance parts.  mine was already in a couple wrecks before I got it.  Interior was a great design but it definitely showed its age.

65

This Thing Will Live Forever. — Damn. I'd have to say this is one of the best designed cars from the 80s or the 90s. Hell, mine was hit by a Semi square in the back. I was stopped, the Semi was estimated to be doing 50mph when he hit me because of the skid marks and when he finally stopped. I still drove that car around for another couple weeks until their insurance company offered nearly four times the kelly blue book value of the car. My only real problem was the 3.8L V6 engine. I always wanted more power. But as for speed, both me and my parents have had it in the 140s. It is also quite surprising acceleration-wise. Not too many turboed hondas or toyotas could keep up with my rear wheel drive, 140hp, 3500lb, automatic transmition, american luxury car with an independent rear suspension.

1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
Tony writes:
1992 Ford Thunderbird Base Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
4

Pros

V-6 has some punch, handles well on sharp turns

Cons

poor stereo, poor braking, automatic seat belts are annoying

25

Old But Good. — My first car. It was old when i got it and i literally drove the wheels off it.

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
Joshua writes:
1992 Ford Thunderbird LX Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
3

Pros

cheap, nice color, takes regular gas

Cons

Way too many mechanical failures before 100k, American cars are not meant to last

35

My First Car — Wow, here's a trip down memory lane. This was my first car. I bought it in exchange for $650 and fixing the previous owner's computer. Probably the only American car I'll ever buy as a main car... Probably the only coupe I'll ever buy as a main car too. I certainly had a love-hate relationship with this car. It's the first car I got pulled over in doing 110mph in a 55. The death of the water pump sealed the fate of this car as it sat in the driveway and was eventually sold to a junk yard for $100. In retrospect, it probably would have been better to blow it up and put it on youtube. *sigh*

Is this review helpful? Yes | No

Displaying 1 - 10 of 11 1992 Ford Thunderbird reviews.

Rank your car

Reviews From Other Years

1955 Ford Thunderbird Reviews

When Thunderbirds Were Sports Cars! By acauto

A 1955 Ford Thunderbird. This review isn't exactly what Car Gurus is probably looking for when they asked me to "Add" a car I owned, but oh well, I do own it and love racing it! Not your typical roa... Read More

The Iconic "specialty Car"... For Crusin On Sunny Days, Or Fair Weather Cruise Nights. By skygazer

Beautiful lines, very attractive car, loads of fun! While not much of a performer in stock trim, can be made to have reasonably good handling and performance at minimal additional cost if you are reb... Read More

Read all 5 1955 Ford Thunderbird reviews

1956 Ford Thunderbird Reviews

Family Heirloom. By VoltFan

A little bit of history. Back in '56 the Thunderbird was more popular than the Corvette. '56 was the first year they had seatbelts. It came equipped with a four barrel carburator on top of a V8 gen... Read More

56 Ford Thunderbird By Steve

This Car Is Almost Identical To My Grandpa's 56 Same Color And Everything And My Gramps Car Is Just As Amazing As This One. The Car Has Both The Convertable Soft Top And The Hard Top. Read More

Read all 3 1956 Ford Thunderbird reviews

1957 Ford Thunderbird Reviews

Kit Car By probobby

Bought this package back 25 years ago and have not concentrated one bit on the assembly. I have rolled it from one location to another, and has always been in the way. Too much work to accomplish the ... Read More

1957 Ford T-bird Owner Review By Naomichi

Perforamce - Soso. First thing you should consider is disc brake conversion. Appearance - Sleek classic lines and gorgeous styling. Build quality - Get real. Its a 51 year old car. Even a fully re... Read More

Read all 6 1957 Ford Thunderbird reviews

1959 Ford Thunderbird Reviews

My 59 Canary Yellow Bird By norsedohr

Convertible top went into the trunk,boot lid pulled up and with trunk closed made for a sleek looking ride.With a 352cu.in.4bbl.,Cruseomatic transmission,it wasn't no muscle car.But then again it neve... Read More

Thunderbird By Bob

Well its in a state of chaos right now as its being restored. But it has 428 Cobra Jet with around 400+ horse power. So hopefully I'll finish this right after we finish restoring the 65 Mustang. The i... Read More

Read all 4 1959 Ford Thunderbird reviews

1960 Ford Thunderbird Reviews

A Defining Machine By georgiepizza

What a machine - we'll never see anything remotely like it again...Stright line comfort and performance - corners like a bucket of seaweed.... power windows and power seats, in 1960!! Wow. An absolute... Read More

Very Interesting, Since I Own A 60 Conv. By 60convbird

The square birds are great cars. I know the convertibles are beautiful cars,and head turners for sure. Read More

Read all 1960 Ford Thunderbird reviews

People researching a 1992 Ford Thunderbird contacted a dealer about

1992 Ford Thunderbird Base, Only pic I have right now, August 2010., exterior
Ford Thunderbird
25% of the time
Ford Mustang
7% of the time
Chevrolet Corvette
3% of the time
Ford F-150
2% of the time
Thunderbird
Looking for a Used Thunderbird in your area?
CarGurus has 763 nationwide Thunderbird listings starting at $5,500.
ZIP: