1992 Chevrolet S-10 User Reviews

1992 Chevrolet S-10 Review Ratings

  • Rank your car

Average Ratings from 20 reviews

  • Performance:3.6 out of 5 stars3.6 out of 5 stars3.6 out of 5 stars3.6 out of 5 stars3.6 out of 5 stars 3.6 / 5
  • Appearance:3.3 out of 5 stars3.3 out of 5 stars3.3 out of 5 stars3.3 out of 5 stars3.3 out of 5 stars 3.3 / 5
  • Build Quality:4.3 out of 5 stars4.3 out of 5 stars4.3 out of 5 stars4.3 out of 5 stars4.3 out of 5 stars 4.3 / 5
  • Overall: 3.9 out of 5 stars3.9 out of 5 stars3.9 out of 5 stars3.9 out of 5 stars3.9 out of 5 stars 3.9 / 5

Review Highlights Click to filter reviews below

PROS
"power" 6 reviews
"fuel economy" 4 reviews
"reliable car" 2 reviews
"speed" 2 reviews
"cheap car" 2 reviews
CONS
"power" 3 reviews
"fuel economy" 2 reviews

User Reviews

Displaying 1 - 10 of 20 1992 Chevrolet S-10 reviews.

SWLR55 writes:
1992 Chevrolet S-10 Tahoe Standard Cab LB Review
Cargo Capacity:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Towing:
Overall:
3

Pros

Small, quick truck

Cons

not a lot of power

SWLR55
25

Solid High School Truck — I'm in high school it was really cheap and got me to work and school everyday. It started in sub zero temperatures and in extreme heat. The truck uses a lot of oil but thats because its an old truck.

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
madmopar writes:
1992 Chevrolet S-10 2-Door Regular Cab Review
Cargo Capacity:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Towing:
Overall:
5

Pros

good fuel economy

Cons

4cyl not very powerful

madmopar
2,445

92 S-10 — i bought this truck new in 92. it was a great little truck. it got about 25mpg with the 4cyl and 5speed. handling was pretty good, 5speed shifter very easy to shift. good little run-around vehicle with decent cargo capacity.

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
Tim writes:
1992 Chevrolet S-10 2-Door Regular Cab Review
Cargo Capacity:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Towing:
Overall:
4

Pros

Its a very light truck with a small block V8....need I say more?

Cons

Minor electrical issues.

55

The Beast — 1992 S10 350ci V8, 2WD, 4sp automatic shift kit. Estimated 220hp, no clue on torque but its a monster (breaks loose in 3rd gear at 45mph). Absolute blast to drive besides the fact that it is slammed so every little bump radiates through the dash board!!!

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
Sean writes:
1992 Chevrolet S-10 2-Door Regular Cab Review
Cargo Capacity:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Towing:
Overall:
4

Pros

this car was there for me everytime that I needed it

Cons

the rust

75

Great Dependable Winter Truck — I thoroughly enjoyed this vehicle. b ought it for nearly nothing and it lasted me for a long time and never left me stranded. I was able to use this truck for anything that needed a truck for with no problems.

Primary Use: Utility (towing boats, transporting cargo, etc.)

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
Christian writes:
1992 Chevrolet S-10 2-Door Regular Cab Review
Cargo Capacity:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Towing:
Overall:
5

Pros

its small and good on gas

Cons

that its a 2wd

25

Its A Easy Car To Fix If Any Thang Goses Wrong With Them — Its for of a sports truck im the second owner i bought it for $1250 and i put about $1000 in it . runs great its nice and clean im in the middle of painting its going to be dark blue im making it in to a street truck

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
Adam writes:
1992 Chevrolet S-10 Maxi Cab Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
3

Pros

4.3 liter V6 kicks some booty!!

Cons

GM truck bodies in the earlyh 1990's sucked major donkey balls so my truck is pretty rusty.

45

Reliable And Rusty:) — love the s-10 line of trucks. I am on my second one and though a little primitive, they have excellent power and are relativley problem free, on top of being cheap to fix. The 4.3 liter V6 is one of GM's best motors and is still in use to this day

Primary Use: Commuting to work

2 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
John writes:
1992 Chevrolet S-10 2-Door Regular Cab Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
5

Pros

5 speed transmission, 4.3 litre v-6, longbox, s10

Cons

standard cab, one wheel wonder, s10

75

Best 2wd Pickup — A 1992 pickup bought as my first vehicle. Long box, 5 speed, power steering, A/C, crank windows, regular locks, 4.3 liter v-6, two tone blue. What else can I say about it other than the fact that I miss it. Had 100,000 miles on it when I got it. Made it out and back to Wyoming from Minnesota, brothers ford couldn't even make the trip once one way. Transmission liked to jump out of 3rd gear towards the end. Don't ever remember putting any parts in it in the 4 years I had it, other than oil and tires. Trying to find another 92 s10 like this one.

1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
Dustin writes:
1992 Chevrolet S-10 2-Door Regular Cab Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
4

Pros

The power

Cons

The gas mileage

35

Stroked 92 Chevy S-10 — 383 storker 468hp, All new bushings and shocks front and rear, So far i have bout 6 grand in the truck total, It gets bout 7 miles to the gallon, This truck is a blast to drive, So far i have not needed to repair it and no rattles thank god

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
Robby writes:
1992 Chevrolet S-10 2-Door Regular Cab Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
4

Pros

it runs

Cons

it doesn't run

25

It Runs — it runs well and is pretty easy to fix. looks kinda crappy but hey it's an old truck. it gets 25 MPG highway and maintainance is relatively cheap. it's a stick and has rear wheel drive so I can drift with it.

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
Kit writes:
1992 Chevrolet S-10 2-Door Regular Cab Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
5

Pros

FUN

Cons

small

65

S-10 Toy — Great little truck. Faster than stock mustang gt's & Camaro's of the same time. Built like a rock. Bumper was dented from running into trees/rocks/hills, but frame was solid. Fun as hell. Cheap. would buy one again as a toy. But like i said, it was small. NOT a family man's truck.

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Is this review helpful? Yes | No

Displaying 1 - 10 of 20 1992 Chevrolet S-10 reviews.

Rank your car

Reviews From Other Years

1982 Chevrolet S-10 Reviews

Great First Truck. By Greg

When I was in HS, we lived out in the country and we "needed" a truck to haul the firewood, take the dogs to the Vet, etc. We could have done this with the family's mini-van, but definitely not my Mo... Read More

Good All Round Little Pick Ups By psmeds

Good overall, could use more power, and they should have made more 4wd, and they should have made a full 4 door S-10. I should note my views are biased (i did a frame off restoration and made it a s... Read More

Read all 5 1982 Chevrolet S-10 reviews

1983 Chevrolet S-10 Reviews

Get An Import By Josh

just a beater got me from point a 2 point b and anywhere in between some it was a good truck that will be missed hell i kinda wish i still had the damn thing so i had a car now Read More

Good Strip Truck By Sam

355ci aluminum heads all roller motor... lookin at about 500hp/650hp with nitrious express 150 shot. TH-475 trans, 8.8" ford rear with 4.56 gear. runs low 11's in quarter, mid 10's with the shot. runs... Read More

Read all 4 1983 Chevrolet S-10 reviews

1984 Chevrolet S-10 Reviews

Reliable, Easy To Work On, Cheap Replacement Parts. No Frills = Low Cost. By RobsToolBelt

Simple to start, easy on the wallet for insurance and gas. Nice to look at, really look forward to keeping this one for a long time running. Wife wont be seen in it...yet, but once it has the exhaus... Read More

It's Easier To Get In Tune With A Truck That Has A Carburetor. By ineffable500

I got up to 26.75 mpg by doing simple carburetor mods and maybe getting a boost from magnetic fuel treatment and a Jenny Cell aetheric energy generator and also a quantum coherence device and a Sophie... Read More

Read all 10 1984 Chevrolet S-10 reviews

1985 Chevrolet S-10 Reviews

Buy One You Will Love It Till The Day You Die By Corie

I had an 85 reg cab long bed 2.3 v6 2wd it had good mpg and ran like a dream. it was easy to fix win it broke down lots of fun to drive and have around. good work truck had enough room to haul anythin... Read More

85 S-10 By Dillon

The performance could be better, but it gets me where i need to be. when i open it up it can get to about 95 mph. Fun truck to drive. easy to park in a parking lot. Not to bad of a car. Read More

Read all 8 1985 Chevrolet S-10 reviews

1986 Chevrolet S-10 Reviews

Good Ol Truck By cavaliers10

It has great power for a 2.8 decent four wheel drive its long wheel base and the good part its orange we've haulers a ton of gravel in it but all in all its a really good truck for all. Read More

How To Burn Through Sawsall Blades By Tim

Nothing stock left. All done in my 2 car garage. Looks kinda cool and only have about $2500 invested in whole thing. Has 350 v8 with ported quickburn heads and solid lift cam. Engine set back 9" f... Read More

Read all 13 1986 Chevrolet S-10 reviews

People researching a 1992 Chevrolet S-10 contacted a dealer about

Picture of 1992 Chevrolet S-10 2-Door Regular Cab, exterior
Chevrolet S-10
27% of the time
Ford Ranger
14% of the time
Ford F-150
6% of the time
S-10
Looking for a Used S-10 in your area?
CarGurus has 1,681 nationwide S-10 listings starting at $1,695.
ZIP: