Sign in | Register | My account |

1989 Ford Taurus User Reviews

1989 Ford Taurus Review Ratings

  • Review your car

Average Ratings from 11 reviews

  • Performance:4.2 out of 5 stars4.2 out of 5 stars4.2 out of 5 stars4.2 out of 5 stars4.2 out of 5 stars 4.2 / 5
  • Appearance:3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars3 out of 5 stars 3 / 5
  • Build Quality:4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars 4 / 5
  • Overall:3.9 out of 5 stars3.9 out of 5 stars3.9 out of 5 stars3.9 out of 5 stars3.9 out of 5 stars 3.9 / 5

Review Highlights Click to filter reviews below

PROS
"power" 4 reviews
"fuel economy" 3 reviews
"reliable car" 2 reviews
"ride" 2 reviews
"speed" 2 reviews
CONS
"power" 2 reviews

User Reviews

Displaying 1 - 10 of 11 reviews 12 Next
Stephen writes:
1989 Ford Taurus Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Pros

FUN, Utility...its a four door with a descent trunk! It is powerful and has a 5 speed.

Cons

People that didn't take care of them pass them on used!

55

I Wish Ford Made A New One, Hey...there Will Be A 2010 Sho ! It Promises To Be Even Better And Fast! — The only downside is that it is now 20 years old. I wish it was new all over again. The Yamaha built 3.0 L engine runs as good as it did when it was new in '89 and has logged more that 200,000 miles. The car turns like it is on rails. It still will do 0-60 in the low 6's. Super smoothe at highway speeds or around town. Good gas millage. Fun to drive! The 2010 SHO is promising. Check it out!

1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
Michael writes:
1989 Ford Taurus Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Pros

Price/Performance, annonymity, creature comforts

Cons

Clutch, tire, and A/C compressor longevity

35

Sho - Wolf In Sheep's Clothing — Keep in mind, this was an SHO. Considered one of the first true American sport sedans. The 1989 was not encumbered by ABS, Airbags, and the like, so it was capable (according to Hot Rod) 0-60 in as little as 6.0 seconds. Not bad for a 3.0 normally aspirated V6. Engine specs were a Ford/Yamaha designed, Yamaha built, 3.0 litre 24-valve V6 that put out 220HP and 200lb./ft. or torque. It was a peaky engine, with most of its power coming on after the secondary intake valves opened at 3800 rpm. Still, with a rev limited 7600 rpm redline, you could reach freeway speeds in 2nd gear. Low end torque was boosted by the unequal length intakes. At low rpms, only one intake was open. It was fed through a long, thin manifold pipe the originated over the opposite cylinder bank. At 3800 rpm, a butterfly valve would open on the second intake, fed by a fat, short manifold pipe, originating over its own cylinder bank. The effect was fast moving air with some back pressure at low rpms, large volumes at high rpms. This had all of the bells and whistles that Ford offered in a car, at the time; automatic air, JBL audio with subwoofer, 6 way adjustable leather front seats, etc. There were a few quirks, being a first year model. The original clutch was too small, so the dealer replaced it with a one inch wider unit. The Goodyear Eagle GT plus 4 tires only lasted about 20,000 miles. But it was a blast to drive. It also had a tendency to break the front motor mount, if you drove it too hard. A/C compressors did not last long. An underdrive pulley is recommended if you want it to live. My best estimate was that I could get between 6.5 and 7.0 0-60's. I did not want to launch it at 3000 rpm, or I could have broken into the low 6's. The original Taurus was a decent handling car for a pedestrian sedan. The SHO took advantage of a solid base and added front and rear anti-roll bars, progressive rate springs, lowered the car one inch, four wheel disc brakes, and used silicon or solid bushings. The result was a car that had nice neutral handling. Push it to the edge and the tail would gently slide out. A little throttle and it would straighten out. It never got out of hand. Torque steer was apparent, but minimized by equal length half shafts. Despite the performance, the SHO regularly delivered 25 mpg in mixed freeway commuting. Avoiding rush hour could probably improve that. Plus, the SHO was the first American car certified as a low emission vehicle. As a result, it did not require many of the power robbing emission controls other engines were saddled with. It had been a fun car to drive, and it was always nice to launch past BMW's and other sport sedans in this "wolf in sheep's clothing". But, alas, after nearly 20 years, the old SHO is tired. The A/C compressor is once again dead, the front oil seal is leaking on the catalytic converter, the O2 sensors are shot, and yes, I broke the front motor mount. Plus, I think the fuel pump is about to seize up. It is now resting comfortably in the driveway, having given way to a commuter econo-box, while I sit and ponder its fate. Perhaps the old wolf will rise again, don its sheep costume, and go up against the youngsters. Maybe this time with a 315HP upgrade.

1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
Matt writes:
1989 Ford Taurus Review
Back Seats:
Cargo Capacity:
Family Car:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Overall:

Pros

Good daily

Cons

No power, no style

25

Solid — Grandma car! Good gas mileage, holds a family of four with no poblem. Has no power, no looks/style, doesn't handle very well, but grabs the attention of 60 year olds an up! Either way, was a good daily driver.

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
Jordan writes:
1989 Ford Taurus Review
Appearance:
Brakes:
Cargo Capacity:
Daily Commute:
Family Car:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Interior Noise:
Interior Space:
Long Trips:
Maintenance Cost:
Performance:
Parking:
Price:
Power:
Quality:
Reliability:
Snow/Ice:
Looks/Style:
Visibility:
Weight:
Overall:

Pros

Great power, Yamaha reliablitiy, a definite creeper.

Cons

Transmission was not made to hold up to the power, and neither were the brakes

95

Theres A First For Everything — This was the first year for the Taurus SHO. For it's time 220 horsepower with a 5 speed manual trans in a 4 door car was unheard of. Engine reliability was flawless. Transmissions had there faults along with a lot of other items. I got this car up to 145 m.p.h. on 131 north one day. Pretty fun, but dumb.

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
Vahan writes:
1989 Ford Taurus Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Pros

Just awesome all-around performer (acceleration, thrill, reliability, gas mileage,total sleeper, etc...)

Cons

Handling could be a bit better--although it's gr8 for a 4500 lb machine!

65

1989 Ford Taurus Sho — SHO, 'nuf said! OOPS, I guess i need to pad it, lol. for a car that has given me a loyal 360K plus, 950kms to a tank (600 miles), $800 insurance a year--lol, reliability like no other--at 250K, i gave the car to my brother to use to go to school, he put 80K in 5 years just changing oil and fillin up gas...THAT'S IT!!! PerFORDmance (lol): AWESOME in everything--a 7 in handling...a little heavy a car, Build Quality: toyota camry, GOUGE ur eyes out! Appearance: a little family-ish, but THAT'S an advantage against cops...lol, Cost of ownership: gas, oil, timing belt/water pump, brakes, and 1 clutch...continually challenged my Civic as to which 1 was cheaper to own! Fun Factor: 1 word...EXHILARATING!!! 1 of the 1000's I've had the chance of driving (and I've driven many...been with cars all my life, 1 of the 2 BEST cars I've owned!!! out of a total 17

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
James writes:
1989 Ford Taurus Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Pros

Goes down the road in one piece.

Cons

Sounds like a washing machine

35

It's A Pos, But It Gets You From Point A To Point B — Never had any real problems with this car. I drove the piss out of it. It's got close to 300,000 miles on it, so I can't complain to much for it's strange noises

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
Cassandra writes:
1989 Ford Taurus Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Pros

Its kinda ugly

Cons

I have a car

35

It's Aight! — It runs great and doesn't look the best but it was only a hundred bucks and it gets me around.

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
Donghyun writes:
1989 Ford Taurus Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Pros

FAST and FURIOUS

Cons

ugly as taurus :(

65

Super Rocket Came In Taurus Shell... — This heavy SHO was scary fast with plenty of torque. Fast enough to take any car on the road.

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
revrad writes:
1989 Ford Taurus Review
Overall:
revrad
25

One Of The Best Cars That I Own — I love this car. The third seat is a riot and it can haul more passangers than most mini-vans. I would buy another one in a heart-beat, but this one just keeps running!

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
Malhaar writes:
1989 Ford Taurus Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Pros

Lasted long very long!

Cons

I wish it was still here!

35

The First Car To Be Part Of My Life! — When I was born my parents had this car, It lasted till 1997! It was a total beast!

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
Displaying 1 - 10 of 11 reviews 12 Next
Review your car

Similar Cars Compared to a 1989 Ford Taurus

1989 Ford Taurus 1989 Toyota Camry 1989 Honda Accord
1989 Ford Taurus picture, exterior
1989 Toyota Camry picture, exterior
1989 Honda Accord picture, exterior
Cost $12,204 Original MSRP $2,918 Average Instant Market Value $2,536 Average Instant Market Value
Gas Mileage (highway) 24 29 28
Horsepower 90 115 98
Front Leg Room (inches) 41.0 42.0 42.0

Reviews From Other Years

2013 Ford Taurus Reviews

Awesome Sho By Brad

The 2013 SHO is a very capable car, it has plenty of power, and it is very comfortable to drive. while it is not a sports car it has enough power to play with most of them... all while the kids a la... Read More

Read all 2013 Ford Taurus reviews

2012 Ford Taurus Reviews

Great Car, I Really Like It By Bill49855

This is my second Taurus, the other was a 2010. Ford has done a great job with style, comfort. I had always been a Chevy guy but would highly reccomend this car to anyone with a big family, does all... Read More

Read all 2012 Ford Taurus reviews

2011 Ford Taurus Reviews

Fun Ride By jester272000

I have had car since October. Car grabs peoples attention and I am always asked about it. Very nice styling from Ford. Does have issues w/ blind spots when backing. Also feel a little incapsulated... Read More

Great Car By 2manyfords

First new car I have bought in many ytears. I am very impressed with. The styling is great and the performance is good. The gas mileage is what I was really wnating and is averaging 19-21 combined so ... Read More

Read all 2011 Ford Taurus reviews

2010 Ford Taurus Reviews

2010 Taurus , One Of The Best Cars I Ever Owned By LenNyG

Great style and handling, comfort in front seat feels like cockpit of jet airplane. Great gas milelage. Great for family travel. Back seats very comfortable even for a big guy like myself Great gas m... Read More

2010 Ford Taurus Sho By muncieimports

Whether on the highway or surrounded by the hustle and bustle of the big city, the 2010 Ford Taurus' cabin remains calm and quiet. Sleek aerodynamics and generous sound insulation help keep wind and r... Read More

Read all 3 2010 Ford Taurus reviews

2009 Ford Taurus Reviews

Ford Tough Don't Have To Be A Truck. By Steven

seat is great. Paint never rust. Interior like new. Basic maintance on car. No major failures yet. 320K + and still drives great. Cold air and simple to operate. 6 CD changer in the trunk. Love this ... Read More

Great Car By Toddnet100

My commute to work was too far to be practical. otherwise this car would have been a keeper. I loved the heated seats on a cold winter morning. I also enjoyed the SYNC system. This car is a great car!... Read More

Read all 2009 Ford Taurus reviews
Ask CarGurus about the 1989 Ford Taurus
OR
Average response time: 8.5 hours, # of Ford Taurus owners:4,719
Taurus
Looking for a Used Taurus in your area?
CarGurus has 25,255 nationwide Taurus listings starting at $1,500.
ZIP: