Related Models For Sale
Other Years
Used Cars For Sale
1982 Chevrolet S-10 Review Ratings
- Review your car
Average Ratings from 5 reviews
- Performance:




4 / 5 - Appearance:




2 / 5 - Build Quality:




4.5 / 5 - Overall:




4.4 / 5
Review Highlights Click to filter reviews below
User Reviews
Loading...
|
Greg writes:
1982 Chevrolet S-10 Review
ProsGreat gas mileage. Could squeeze 3 college students in the front cab. Got me through HS and first couple years of college. Could fit everything that went into my dorm room in the bed of the truck. ConsNo power; 1.8 L 4 cylinder engine.
65
Great First Truck. — When I was in HS, we lived out in the country and we "needed" a truck to haul the firewood, take the dogs to the Vet, etc. We could have done this with the family's mini-van, but definitely not my Mom's CRX or Prelude. Plus, I needed a dependable set of wheels to get me to school, football practice and work. Enter the '82 Chevy S-10, which was ~8 years old when I got her. What I wanted was the big C-10 on the lot, but the S-10 found its way home instead. So, I made the most of it. Not that we were able to go fast, but I fit the entire O & D line in the S-10. Three of us in the cab (windows open, arms hanging out) and the rest in the back...my poor shocks, but she got us from the weight room to the practice field. During HS, we put as much wood in the bed as we could fit w/o it falling out, which was ~1/2 a cord of wood; pre-split. I learned how to drive backwards / in reverse in that truck, backing up the country lane with a full bed of wood. She got me through the first couple years of college. Many of my classmates thought that I had a 4x4 with the way she handled in the snow; I just had ~450 lbs of concrete blocks in the back over the axle and treated the snow / ice with the respect it deserves. But, one thing that she couldn't do very well was go up Route 56 to Johnstown nor keep up on the PA Turnpike. Granted, I did my level best, but she just couldn't keep up with a v6 or full-size with an 8 cylinder under the hood and horsepower to spare. But, the S-10 was a good truck. She got me through HS and early college years w/o any major issues. We were able to haul just about whatever we wanted in the bed. I had a couple nice sound-systems in the cab, including a 2 x 10" truck-box and amplifier. When I replaced the S-10, she stayed in the family and was passed down to my sister as her first vehicle. She then sold the S-10 to someone in the late '90s who swapped out the 4 for a v6 and put a 3" lift kit on it. She said she saw the S-10 around town a few times and the new owner had done a good job with it. Great truck for a HS / college student. It wouldn't be my choice for a family vehicle, unless it were just my wife & me. If you need a light-duty, low-cost truck to haul stuff: 1/2 cord of wood, light 8' trailer, couple dog crates, etc., then the '82 S-10 will do you well. I'd look into replacing the 4 cylinder with something that has a bit more power, but would be OK on the flats and not trying to keep up with highway traffic. Great option for a sound-system platform, as the cable runs are easy to manage and a blow-through would be a viable option with a cap, if not sticking with just an 8 - 10" truck-box (maybe a slim-line 12" could fit behind the seats, but not much more than a standard sized 10" truck box for someone ~6'). |
|
psmeds writes:
1982 Chevrolet S-10 Review
ProsMPG, cargo space, cheap to maintain and everything can be done yourself ConsUnderpowered, small seating capacity
35
Good All Round Little Pick Ups — Good overall, could use more power, and they should have made more 4wd, and they should have made a full 4 door S-10. I should note my views are biased (i did a frame off restoration and made it a show truck so I love it) Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.) |
|
Mitch writes:
1982 Chevrolet S-10 Review
ProsBurns The Tires All Day Long ConsExhaust Droan On The Highway
25
355 S10 — 355 small block chevy 400+ HP fully built 700 R4 Transmission 4:11 LSD Lowered 4/3 Custom Interior With Buckets Dual 3'' Flowmaster Exhaust Full Set Of Stewart Warner Gaugues B&M Pro Ratchet Shifter MSD Iginition System (6al2) Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.) |
|
Damien writes:
1982 Chevrolet S-10 Review
ProsI built this truck and is very dependable Conslots of time and work in it
85
82 S10 4.3 — I build this truck pretty much and its does pretty good. The motor is a 4.3 so its alot better than the 2.8 but in my opinion a 350 and higher is better than it but the 4.3 on my scale ranks a high 4. The apearance isn't quite finished yet so its not all that perfect |
|
Peter writes:
1982 Chevrolet S-10 Review
ProsFairly Reliable, Old but hasn't needed much work to keep it on the road ConsRust Covered and could use More Power
25
An Oldy But A Goodie — Awsome Truck!! First Vehicle I owned. It is now Rust Red and Steel Grey. Great Performance, though I would like more power for that much funner of a drive. For an '82 it is in decent mechanical condition, though I did just need to do some work on the Starter. Also considering the age it gets decent milage, about 600-700km per 60L tank. A fun vehicle to drive, and as I fix it up it will only get better. |
Similar Cars Compared to a 1982 Chevrolet S-10
Reviews From Other Years
2004 Chevrolet S-10 Reviews
Great Overall Truck By Cakana
I got this truck for a daily driver and for the snow. It drives great and handles very good in the snow. Only things bad are the size of the truck bed and it eats through gas with its V6 engine. Read More
Great Vehicle That Could Use A Slightly Better Gas Economy By Zane
acceleration above par braking smooth and not too sudden handles fantastic, great power steering build only issue is the common one that chevrolets have which is the front left tire has an issue that ... Read More
2003 Chevrolet S-10 Reviews
Wouldn't Give It Up For The World...unless I Got An Eclipse. By Arik
Performance is great its needed a repair already but that was my dads fault the appearance is nice would be better with some seat covers though gas mileage isnt horrible but still pretty bad and yes... Read More
Why Did Chevy Stop Making This Model, The Colorado Doesn't Hold A Candle To It. By doublenickel8
The Silver Bullet had a good run. In the end a near-totalling wreck in 2007 just prior to a few years of me being overseas and it not being used regularly caught up with it and its engine couldn't ta... Read More
2002 Chevrolet S-10 Reviews
Not For Sale Ever By Rob
good motor around 190 hp brakes are pretty good handles nice has a couple dings and scratches but hey it is a truck the looks are great mini truck on steroids gas mileage is bad for a v6 fun and c... Read More
Hauler With Comfort My Third S-10 By Chuck
Comfortable and tough! A hauler and Brawler for a smaller truck it holds is own! Wish it had better gas mileage but who dosen't? This is my third S-10! I drove to Indy to get this one and would do i... Read More
2001 Chevrolet S-10 Reviews
Fun To Drive By RICH1LT
Loved taking it to car shows and winning trophies took 1st & 2nd place alot. the only neg thing was it was a 4 cyl and when the air was on it cound not get out of its own way. but i loved working on... Read More
Oooo Look At Me By Tim
it has airbags. custom made six link in the rear and stock upper and lower control arms in the front. running slam specialties re6 bags all around. still have more work to finish up on the outside bef... Read More
2000 Chevrolet S-10 Reviews
Laughable By Mark
2.2 liter engine, extreamly good MPG considering they said 20 on highway an got 32mpg with an auto. no power to pull anything with the 2.2 needed the 4.3 but that was 350 more per monthly lease paym... Read More
Very Nice. Great Value For The Money. Strong Truck. By jshannon123
This truck will take you anywhere and even through any kind of mud or water. It's very dependable and I would drive this truck anywhere. It's roomy to be a smaller truck and is very appealing and st... Read More
| OR |