Average Ratings from 27 reviews
- Performance:
- Appearance:
- Build Quality:
- Overall:
Review Highlights Click to filter reviews below
|
Michael writes:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro Review
ProsStyle power speed. Pure Big Block Muscle car ConsNo power steering, not the best gas mileage but not driven very much
75
Rs/ss Camaro — 67' RS/SS 427 Camaro. 500/500. Built for straight line speed while trying to maintain street manners. Owned since 83'. Many modifications through the years but retains all original sheet metal including original floorpans. Its a big hotwheels car, looks fast sitting still. Lots of SS, chrome and billet aluminum hi/po parts, some hand crafted, including full 3inch SS dual exhaust.
| ||
|
Andy writes:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro Review
Pros510 HP 505 FT LBS Cons6 mpg and no A/C
55
My 67 — Its a red first generation Camaro with over 500 hp, a muncie 4 speed and 3.73 gears. Whats not to like? I've had it since I was 13 and have completely restored it from the ground up. This car is definitely the most fun to drive. Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.) | ||
|
Dan writes:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro Review
ProsFun ConsExpensive to run
55
1967 Camaro Rs — My 1967 Camaro RS. This car has an all cast iron 540 with cast iron GM 990 heads and runs carburated on alcohol, GM 400 turbo trans and 4.11 gears. The best the car has ran is 9.07 @ 147mph with a 1.24 sixty foot time/ Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.) | ||
|
Ron writes:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro Review
ProsIt's good looking. ConsNo power steering.
35
Very Nice And Good Looking — It's a red convertible. Almost all original. One thing i don't like is that it doesn't have power steering. This car is a nice show room car, not the greatest for everyday driving. But if your driving in like a cruise this car is one to get! Primary Use: Family transportation | ||
|
Derrick writes:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro Review
Pros450 horses, black paint, hide away headlights ConsLoose distributer, missing oil cap, windsheild wiper box loose, cracked manifold... it just needed some extra work the dealer told us it DIDN'T need
45
Beast. — It's pretty much a freaking beast. 454 4 Speed with around 450 horsepower, crazy acceleration, sounds awesome, and looks amazing with the hide away headlights, white RS stripe, black paint and Torque Thrust II rims with the ZRI tires. Used to own a 1969 350 Chevelle but this car kills it | ||
|
Robert writes:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro Review
ProsHandles Beautifully goes like a bat out of hell. Good visibility solid door slam bit 18 inch wheels up front 22 inches in back. Sky blue needs few chips filled and matched. ConsGas only 93 octane needs restoration, glass old and scrapped up over years, electrics unreliable for brake lights, tachometer, radio, floor panels rusting and hole drivers side. New carpet, weather seals, wiring.
35
Good Daily Cruiser — This car was great back in day and still is but needs to be restored, engine and transmission good for being 2 speed power glide. Lots of looks and handles well for 1960's suspension technology. Starts on first turn on key deluxe black interior with white seats. Deluxe gauges and tachometer. Bought for 7,000 worth 12,000 in current condition. | ||
|
ZDragon007 writes:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro Review
ProsPower, Looks & Performance. ConsGets too much attention, Can't leave it alone and expect it to be there upon returning. Handling, only great in a straight line! 
35
| ||
|
jdlsierra writes:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro Review
Proslots of HP Consstops at all gas stations 
25
Nice Weekend Driver — i liked building and painting this SS, it takes about 2 years for me in my spare time working lots of hours each week on motor, bodywork, brakes , electrical, interior,and painting , wet sanding and polishing...not perfect but still a very nice driver. Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.) | ||
|
cavry writes:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro Review
ProsRide is good, handling is excellent, power moderate with original equipment. Looks are far above anything else ConsRear seat is not really comfortable. Have to be careful about certain replacement parts as the first Camaros used parts from other Chev vehicles
35
Wouldn't Let It Go For Any Price. — 2/2012 Just put my optional drive train in it for a while. 396 / Saginaw 4 sp. crashbox. OH what joy. Pure good looks. Love to watch the NOx'ers drool. The bucket (w/o headrests) seats are very comfortable to me, but then I'm only 5'8"/150 lbs. Driver side floorboard irritating to passenger as part of it was driven 1 1/2" into the foot area years ago to get Dougman headers on it. Stability and stance are great, partially because the rear tires are mounted on "deep dish" station wagon rims (w/original hub caps) and the front is on early 70's chevy smoke grey 5 spoke mags. I bought this used in 1970 and it has been and is a real joy to have. It's still a driver and will stay so. I'm retired, so I really get to enjoy it now. Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.) | ||
|
Jonathan writes:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro Review
ProsYou can never go wrong with a old muscle car ConsExpensive
25
Great Car — Performance - The engine is a 454 from a pickup with long tube headers and Edelbrock carburetor. Build Quality - Some of the trim pieces have come off inside and outside. Appearance - The driver side door is a little warped and there is some surface rust under the car. Cost of Ownership - We are going to have to put a lot of money into this car before it is road worthy. Fun Factor - The transmission is set for drag racing so it is pretty fun but it does not have enough power to get it to go fast enough. Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.) |
|
Looking for a Used Camaro in your area?
CarGurus has 34,073 nationwide Camaro listings
starting at $2,500.
|