-
- Home /
- Research /
- Austin-Healey /
- 3000 /
- 1967
1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Review Ratings
- Review your car
Average Ratings from 4 reviews
- Performance:




4.5 / 5 - Appearance:




5 / 5 - Build Quality:




3.5 / 5 - Overall:




4 / 5
User Reviews
Loading...
|
Jackstar writes:
1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Review
ProsGreat old technology. No electronic stuff ConsLucas
25
Love It — Always wanted one. In the 1960's they were the ultimate British sports car. Jaguars were too much of a status symbol, and the other British sports cars were a little light weight. They had the speed record for a while, and it still seems to me to go like a bat out of ..... I also like that they don't make them any more, so they didn't ever go off the rails like Porsches. I used to have one of those, but got rid of it because it became such a status symbol. Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.) |
|
DevonGTX writes:
1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Review
ProsGreat looks, rare, British ConsUnreliable, poor quality, hard to find parts
25
Good Starter Classic Car — Got it from my uncle, with a torn ragtop, scratched, unoriginal paint, and only running on 5 cylinders. I got the engine and transmission professionally fixed, but still coughed and was a very unreliable car. Terrible resale, too. Great Britain isn't always great. Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.) |
|
CarManSam writes:
1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Review
ProsGood looking, good gas mileage, etc. ConsUnreliable, unsafe
35
Good — My Austin Healey Mk.III is a 2+2 with a 6-cylinder engine and manual transmission. In fair condition, needs fixing constantly. No seat-belts. Soft-top convertible. Red, after market radio. Over all, I love it. It is pretty rare, with only 42000 mde. Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.) |
|
Andrew writes:
1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Review
ProsAll Originale, Unrestored ConsSome Dings
35
Shes A Beauty! — -Runs well and very strong -Observers do a double take when informed that it is original, unrestored with original paint. -Overall great condition with just the right patina -There are a few dings, but they are like proud battle scars still sporting the original paint -What you see is what you get. It has been well maintained but noboody has messed with it nor has it ever been taken apart. -Only modifications are: >72 spoke chrome wheels / have original >Monza exhaust / have original >Halley fuel pump and regulator |
Reviews From Other Years
1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Reviews
1966 Austin Healey 3000 Mark 3 Phase 2 By John
It's bitter-sweet because I inherited it from my former professor, Clay Shepherd from Indiana University, whom I wish was still driving it, of course. It's a bit squirrelly compared to modern cars. ... Read More
It's British By Skip
It's expensive to restore...hopefully my great-great grandchildren can drive me around in it. Read More
1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Reviews
A Grand Original Austin Healey By Jerry
I bought this car for what many thought was the princely sum of $8K. I sold it some years later for over $20K to put an addition on my house. Today its worth close to $100K. A great early BJ8 (Mk I... Read More
1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Reviews
Austin Healy. British Heaven, Lucas Hell By Steven
British sports car, good looking and fun to drive. It was in a constant state of repair. The only car I have ever owned in which the distributor cap caught fire. In the rain I had to drive over 80 to ... Read More
1959 Austin-Healey 3000 Reviews
Fall In Love...fall Into The Driver's Seat Of A Healey! By Allan
I loved that first Healy! My old man had a new MGB and I could take him easily, but that is not what I really lliked about the car. At eighteen it was a real chick magnet! There are so many things I... Read More
'56 Austin-healey 3000, For Fun That Those More Expensive Sports Cars! By Henry
My '59 A-H 3000 is the most fun car I own, it may not be the fastest, and it's not the most expensive but theres somthing about that inline 6 pushing about 100 horsepower. It's build pretty well for ... Read More
| OR |